Latest Entries »

Occupy Wall Street Photos 19 September 2011

Wall Street at the New York Stock Exchange Closed[Image]
Wall Street Pedestrian Traffic Corraled by Barriers[Image][Image]
Wall Street Area Financial Buildings Looming over Liberty Camp (aka Zuccotti Park)[Image]
Camp Speakers Corner[Image]
[Image]
[Image]
[Image]
Bystanders Observing the Speakers[Image]
[Image]
Main Camp Pizza Supplier[Image]
[Image]
[Image]
[Image]
[Image]
[Image]
[Image]
[Image]
[Image]
[Image]
[Image]
[Image]
[Image]
[Image]
[Image]
[Image]
[Image]
[Image]
[Image]
[Image]
[Image]
[Image]
[Image]
Federal Reserve Bank of New York Ostensible Regulator of Wall Street Banks, One Block From Liberty Camp[Image]

“I know not with what weapons World War III will be fought, but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones.” Albert Einstein.

This movie is dedicated to all the war-loving couch-potatoes, media whores, and psychopathic politicians.

Alexander Walterowitsch Litwinenko (russisch Александр Вальтерович Литвиненко, wiss. Transliteration Aleksandr Val’terovič Litvinenko; * 30. August 1962 in Woronesch; † 23. November 2006 in London) war KGB-Agent und FSB-Offizier, später Putin-Kritiker und Buchautor.

Nach Abschluss der Mittelschule wurde Litwinenko 1980 in die Armee einberufen. Ab 1988 war er in der Abteilung für Spionageabwehr des sowjetischen Geheimdienstes KGB tätig. In verschiedenen Konfliktherden der Sowjetunion und später Russlands war er an Kampfeinsätzen beteiligt. Beim FSB, der russischen Nachfolgeorganisation des KGB ab 1991, war Litwinenko im Kampf gegen Terrorismus und organisiertes Verbrechen eingesetzt.
Vom Agenten zum Kritiker des russischen Machtapparates [Bearbeiten]

1998 trat Litwinenko erstmals als Kritiker des russischen Machtapparates an die Öffentlichkeit: Auf einer Pressekonferenz in Moskau beschuldigte er – zusammen mit Michail Trepaschkin und einigen anderen maskierten Geheimdienstlern – die Führung des Geheimdienstes FSB der Anstiftung zum Mord. Sie hätten von dieser den Auftrag bekommen, den damaligen Sekretär des Staatsicherheitsrats, Boris Beresowski, zu töten.[1]

Im März 1999 wurde Litwinenko erstmals verhaftet, in einem Strafverfahren im November desselben Jahres aber freigesprochen. Noch im Gerichtssaal wurde er erneut festgenommen, im Jahr 2000 schließlich aus der Haft entlassen. Litwinenko behauptete, die Anschuldigungen gegen ihn seien konstruiert gewesen. Und bei der Haftentlassung habe er sich verpflichten müssen, nicht aus der Russischen Föderation auszureisen. In der Folge wurde ein drittes Strafverfahren gegen ihn eröffnet. Nach eigenen Angaben wurden Litwinenko und seine Familie vom FSB bedroht, was ihn noch im Jahr 2000 zur illegalen Ausreise bewogen habe.

Litwinenko traf am 1. November 2000 in London ein und beantragte politisches Asyl. Dieses wurde ihm und seiner Familie im Mai 2001 gewährt. In Großbritannien betätigte sich Litwinenko als Journalist und Buchautor, finanziert vom ebenfalls in London lebenden Boris Beresowski.[2] Im Oktober 2006 – wenige Wochen vor seinem Tod – erhielt Litwinenko die britische Staatsbürgerschaft. Laut Daily Mail betätigte sich Litwinenko in London als MI6-Agent.[3]
Kritik aus dem Londoner Asyl (ab November 2000) [Bearbeiten]

Litwinenko machte eine Reihe von Anschuldigungen öffentlich, die seine früheren Geheimdienstkollegen von KGB und FSB und den früheren FSB-Chef Wladimir Putin belasten oder diskreditieren. Diese Behauptungen konnten bislang von unabhängigen Medien weder bestätigt noch widerlegt werden.
Sprengstoffanschläge auf Wohnhäuser 1999 [Bearbeiten]

Hauptartikel: Sprengstoffanschläge auf Moskauer Wohnhäuser

Zusammen mit Juri Felschtinski, einem US-amerikanischen Historiker russischer Herkunft, verfasste er 2002 das Buch Eiszeit im Kreml. Das Komplott der russischen Geheimdienste (im russischen Original: ФСБ взрывает Россию). Die auf Menschenrechtsfragen spezialisierte russische Nachrichtenagentur Prima, die vom ehemaligen Sowjetdissidenten Alexander Podrabinek geleitet wird, ließ das Buch in Lettland drucken und wollte es in Moskau mit einer Auflage von 4400 Exemplaren verkaufen. Der Lastwagen mit der Auflage wurde indes im Rahmen einer Antiterror-Aktion beschlagnahmt.[4]

Die zentrale These des Buches ist, dass die Sprengstoffanschläge von 1999 auf Wohnhäuser in Moskau und anderen russischen Städten, bei denen rund 300 Menschen den Tod fanden, entgegen den Behauptungen von offiziellen russischen Stellen nicht von tschetschenischen Terroristen verübt wurden. Vielmehr gingen die Anschläge – so die Autoren – auf das Konto des russischen Geheimdienstes FSB und dienten im Rahmen einer Strategie der Spannung als Vorwand für die Entfesselung des Zweiten Tschetschenienkriegs.[5]

Dieselbe Theorie vertraten auch Mitglieder einer öffentlichen Kommission um Sergei Kowaljow. Ihre Mitglieder wurden von einer Reihe von Zwischenfällen heimgesucht:

* Der Kommissionsvorsitzende Sergej Juschenkow wurde am 17. April 2003 erschossen.[6]
* Der Ermittler der Kommission, Rechtsanwalt Michail Trepaschkin – wie Litwinenko ein ehemaliger FSB-Offizier – wurde im Oktober 2003 festgenommen, als die Polizei in seinem Auto eine Pistole fand. Vermutlich wurde sie ihm untergeschoben, doch wurde Trepaschkin im Mai 2004 wegen Verrats von Staatsgeheimnissen und illegalem Besitz von Munition zu vier Jahren Lagerhaft verurteilt. Nach Angaben von Amnesty International war das Verfahren „offenbar politisch motiviert“ und entsprach „nicht den internationalen Standards für faire Verfahren“. Russische Menschenrechtsgruppen gingen davon aus, dass „die Anklagen gegen ihn konstruiert wurden, um zu verhindern, dass er seine Ermittlungen zu den 1999 verübten Bombenanschlägen auf Wohnhäuser fortsetzen konnte“, so Amnesty International.[7]
* Das Kommissionsmitglied Juri Schtschekotschichin, Vize-Chefredakteur der Zeitung Nowaja Gaseta, starb am 3. Juli 2003. Offizielle Todesursache war eine seltene Hautveränderung, das sogenannte Lyell-Syndrom. Familie und Weggefährten vermuten jedoch, dass Schtschekotschichin vergiftet wurde.[8]

Organisation der Geiselnahme im Moskauer Theater 2002 [Bearbeiten]

Im Juni 2003 behauptete Litwinenko im Interview mit dem australischen TV-Sender SBS, dass mindestens zwei der Tschetschenen, die das Moskauer Musical-Theater erstürmt hatten, in Wahrheit für den FSB gearbeitet hatten und vom FSB zur Geiselnahme angestiftet worden waren. Angeblich konnten die beiden ihm bekannten Tschetschenen später nicht unter den Toten gefunden werden, weil sie vom FSB herausgeholt worden waren. Litwinenko war überzeugt, dass die Geiselnahme in Wahrheit eine geplante Aktion des FSB war.[9]
Unterstützung von al-Qaida [Bearbeiten]

In einem Interview im Juli 2005 mit der polnischen Zeitung Rzeczpospolita warf Litwinenko dem von Putin geführten FSB vor, im Jahr 1998 Aiman az-Zawahiri und andere al-Qaida-Führer in der an Tschetschenien angrenzenden Teilrepublik Dagestan trainiert zu haben.[10]
Romano Prodis KGB-Komplizenschaft [Bearbeiten]

Im April 2006 sorgten Anschuldigungen gegen den italienischen Ministerpräsidenten Romano Prodi für Aufmerksamkeit. Litwinenko habe vor seiner Ausreise im Jahr 2000 vom ehemaligen stellvertretenden Direktor des FSB, Anatoli Trofimow erfahren, dass Prodi mit dem KGB zusammenarbeitete. Dies erklärte der britische Europaabgeordnete Gerard Batten am 3. April 2006 im EU-Parlament.[11][12]
Pädophilie-Anschuldigungen gegen Putin [Bearbeiten]

Litwinenko beschuldigte im Juli 2006 auf der Website der tschetschenischen Separatistenbewegung Wladimir Putin der Veranlagung zur Pädophilie.[13] Er verglich ihn mit dem bekannten ukrainischen Serienmörder und Kannibalen Andrei Tschikatilo.
Letzte, unveröffentlichte Recherchen [Bearbeiten]
Zerschlagung von Jukos [Bearbeiten]

Vor seinem Tod soll Litwinenko brisantes Material über die Zerschlagung des russischen Ölkonzerns Jukos gesammelt haben. Dies berichtete die britische Tageszeitung The Times. Litwinenko habe Unterlagen besessen, die bewiesen, dass mehrere Mitarbeiter des Unternehmens verschwunden oder gestorben seien und dass die russische Regierung an diesen Verbrechen direkt beteiligt gewesen sei. Die Akte habe Litwinenko dem früheren, mittlerweile in Israel lebenden Jukos-Vize Leonid Newslin übergeben.[14]
Ermordung von Anna Politkowskaja [Bearbeiten]

Eigenen Aussagen zufolge hat Litwinenko sich zuletzt auch mit dem Mord an der Moskauer Journalistin Anna Politkowskaja beschäftigt. Er soll sich am Tag seiner Vergiftung mit Polonium-210 mit dem italienischen Geheimdienstexperten Mario Scaramella getroffen haben, der ihm angeblich wichtige Unterlagen zu diesem Fall überreichte. Darin sollen Mitglieder einer Spezialeinheit des FSB als Urheber des Mordes an Politkowskaja angeführt werden. Litwinenko sei in diesen Unterlagen ebenso wie der in London lebende russische Oligarch Beresowski als nächstes Ziel von Anschlägen genannt worden.[15]
Kooperation mit spanischen Behördern [Bearbeiten]

Laut einem Bericht der Tageszeitung El Pais informierte Litwinenko kurz vor seinem Tod die spanischen Behörden über Aufenthaltsort, Rolle und Aktivitäten zahlreicher Mitglieder der russischen Mafia. In einem Treffen im Mai 2006 soll er insbesondere Informationen über Izguilov, Zahkar Kalashov und Tariel Oniani weitergegeben haben.[16]
Tod [Bearbeiten]
Das Grab Alexander Litwinenkos

Am 1. November 2006 ließ sich Litwinenko mit Vergiftungserscheinungen in ein Krankenhaus einweisen. In den folgenden Tagen verschlechterte sich sein Zustand rasant. Die Mediziner gingen zuerst davon aus, dass Thallium für den körperlichen Verfall Litwinenkos gesorgt hatte. Erst wenige Stunden vor dem Ableben fand man große Mengen der radioaktiven Substanz Polonium-210 im Urin.[17]

Litwinenko starb am 23. November 2006 um 21:21 Uhr Ortszeit an den Folgen der durch Polonium verursachten Strahlenkrankheit. Nur wenige Stunden, bevor er das Bewusstsein verlor, erklärte Litwinenko in einem Interview mit der Times, dass er vom Kreml zum Schweigen gebracht worden sei.[18]

Die Beerdigung auf dem Londoner Highgate-Friedhof (lt. Merkur Online vom 7. Dezember 2006) wurde nach islamischem Ritus abgehalten (Litwinenko war kurz vor seinem Tod zum Islam übergetreten).[19][20]

Litwinenko hinterließ seine Frau Marina und einen zehnjährigen Sohn.
Der Fall Litwinenko [Bearbeiten]
Ermittlungen [Bearbeiten]

Die Ermittlungen im Fall Litwinenko werden von Scotland Yard geführt; die britische Polizeibehörde stufte den Tod am 6. Dezember 2006 als Mord ein.[21][22][23] Am darauf folgenden Tag eröffnete auch die russische Staatsanwaltschaft ein Verfahren wegen Mordes an Litwinenko. Damit wird – falls die Ermittlungen zu einem offiziellen Ergebnis kommen – ein Prozess gegen mutmaßliche Täter in Russland möglich.[24]

Nach bisherigen Erkenntnissen wurde Litwinenko am 1. November 2006 in der Bar des Millennium Hotel mit Polonium-haltigem Tee vergiftet.[25] Hier traf er sich mit den russischen Geschäftsmännern (und früheren KGB-Mitarbeitern) Andrei Lugowoi und Dmitri Kowtun.[26] Möglicherweise war noch eine weitere Person namens “Wladislaw” involviert; diese steht im Verdacht, den kontaminierten Tee zubereitet und Litwinenko übergeben zu haben.[27][28] Nach dem Treffen im Millennium Hotel war Litwinenko mit Mario Scaramella zum Mittagessen in einer Sushi-Bar verabredet. Und anschließend traf er sich mit dem tschetschenischen Rebellensprecher Achmed Sakajew.[29]

Im Visier von Scotland Yard steht insbesondere Lugowoi, vgl. unten „Verfahren gegen Lugowoi“. Aber auch Kowtun ist nicht unverdächtig, ließen sich doch Polonium-Spuren bei seinen Verwandten in Deutschland nachweisen.[30]
Spekulationen über die Täterschaft [Bearbeiten]
Litwinenko beschuldigt Putin [Bearbeiten]

Am 21. November – zwei Tage vor seinem Tod – diktierte Litwinenko seinem Vater einen Abschiedsbrief. Darin machte er den russischen Präsidenten Putin für seinen Tod verantwortlich:

„Während ich hier liege, höre ich in aller Deutlichkeit die Flügel des Todesengels. Möglicherweise kann ich ihm noch einmal entkommen, aber ich muss sagen, meine Beine sind nicht so schnell, wie ich es gerne hätte. Ich denke deshalb, dass es an der Zeit ist, ein oder zwei Dinge dem Menschen zu sagen, der für meinen jetzigen Zustand verantwortlich ist. Sie [Putin] werden es vielleicht schaffen, mich zum Schweigen zu bringen, aber dieses Schweigen hat einen Preis. Sie haben sich als so barbarisch und rücksichtslos erwiesen, wie Ihre ärgsten Feinde es behauptet haben. Sie haben gezeigt, dass Sie keine Achtung vor dem Leben, vor der Freiheit oder irgendeinem Wert der Zivilisation haben. Sie haben sich als Ihres Amtes unwürdig erwiesen, als unwürdig des Vertrauens der zivilisierten Männer und Frauen. Sie werden es vielleicht schaffen, einen Mann zum Schweigen zu bringen. Aber der Protest aus aller Welt, Herr Putin, wird für den Rest des Lebens in Ihren Ohren nachhallen. Möge Gott Ihnen vergeben, was Sie getan haben, nicht nur mir angetan haben, sondern dem geliebten Russland und seinem Volk.“

– Abschiedsbrief Litwinenkos, übersetzt von der AFP.[31]

Putin wies die Anschuldigungen bezüglich einer Beteiligung Moskaus an der Ermordung Litwinenkos als unbegründet zurück.[17]
Spekulationen westlicher Medien [Bearbeiten]

Das Medieninteresse für das Schicksal Litwinenkos entbrannte Mitte November 2006, nachdem sich dessen Zustand massiv verschlechtert hatte. Nach Angaben des Guardian stellte zu Beginn die PR-Agentur Chime Communications – im Auftrag von Beresowski – eine Kampagne auf die Beine. Die Agentur verbreitete Informationen über den Gesundheitszustand von Litwinenko mit Fotos aus dem Krankenhaus.[32]

Die meisten westlichen Medien heben das Interesse hervor, das “Moskau”, das “Putin-Regime”, der “russische Geheimdienst” an einer Beseitigung Litwinenkos gehabt haben könnte.[33] Ergänzend werden die Täter auch in den Kreisen der russischen Mafia vermutet.[34] Diskutiert wird aber auch die in Russland verbreitete Theorie, dass eine andere Täterschaft bewusst den Verdacht auf “Moskau” lenken wollte.[32][35]

Laut der Theorie des US-Journalisten Edward Jay Epstein war Litwinenko in kriminelle Machenschaften wie den Schmuggel mit gefährlichen Materialien verwickelt. Epstein, der an einem Buch über den Gifttod arbeitet, behauptet in einem Artikel, dass Litwinenko in den Schmuggel des radioaktiven Polonium-210 verwickelt gewesen sei und sich dabei selbst vergiftet habe.[36]
Spekulationen in Russland [Bearbeiten]

Der Berater des Präsidenten, Sergei Jastrschembski, vermutete in einer Reportage des russischen Staatssenders Westi ein Komplott gegen die Regierung: „Ich denke, wir haben es mit einer gut organisierten Kampagne oder einem konsequenten Plan zur Diskreditierung Russlands und seiner Führung zu tun.“[37]

Ende Dezember 2006 bezeichnete die russische Generalstaatsanwaltschaft Leonid Newslin als möglichen Auftraggeber für den Mord an Litwinenko. Der seit 2003 in Israel lebende ehemalige Mitbesitzer des Ölunternehmens Jukos hat die Verdächtigung als „absoluten Schwachsinn“ zurückgewiesen.[38][39]

Der nationalbolschewistische Regierungskritiker Eduard Limonow wiederum stützte die These Litwinenkos und stellte Präsident Putin an den Pranger: „Das Argument all der Herren ist: Es war für Putin nicht nützlich, den Befehl zur Beseitigung Litwinenkos und Politkowskajas zu geben. Doch dieses Argument passt nicht für Herrn Putin und seine Umgebung. Die Jukos-Affäre hat dem Image Russlands und Putins gewaltigen Schaden zugefügt, hat sich negativ ausgewirkt auf die Entwicklung Russlands und wird sich noch weiter negativ auswirken. Trotzdem hat man die Jukos-Spitze mit unnützer Grausamkeit und Rachsucht verfolgt. Der Beschuss der Schule in Beslan, der Gasangriff auf das Kino Nord-Ost haben die unmenschlichen, tierischen Züge des Regimes gezeigt – sie waren völlig unnütz und wurden dennoch befohlen. Putin ist ein Mensch der Rache und der Emotionen. Litwinenko war im Jahr 2006 schon nicht mehr aktuell. Doch man hat Rache genommen für die Pressekonferenz des Jahres 1998, für sein Buch ‚Wie der FSB Russland in die Luft sprengt‘. Das war eine demonstrative, auf Schau angelegte Bestrafung – lange und quälend, zur Abschreckung.“[40]

Eine weitere Meinung vertritt Julia Latynina, die prominente russische Wirtschaftsjournalistin der Nowaja Gaseta und Buchautorin: „Das Verbrechen trägt die Handschrift einer aggressiven Fraktion innerhalb der Staatssicherheit, deren Ziel es ist, Putins Integrationsbemühungen gen Westen Einhalt zu bieten.“[41]
Verfahren gegen Lugowoi [Bearbeiten]

Scotland Yard besaß laut dem Guardian bereits im Januar 2007 genügend Beweise, um ein Auslieferungsgesuch für den nach Russland zurückgereisten früheren KGB-Mann Lugowoi zu beantragen.[42] Ende Mai 2007 schließlich – kurz vor dem Ende der Regierungszeit Tony Blairs – ersuchte London offiziell um Auslieferung Lugowois an Großbritannien.

Unter Berufung auf die Verfassung der Russischen Föderation, die eine Auslieferung russischer Staatsbürger an andere Staaten untersage, wurde dieses Auslieferungsgesuch abgelehnt. Gleichzeitig verwies die russische Generalstaatsanwaltschaft aber auf die Möglichkeit, in Russland ein Strafverfahren gegen Lugowoi zu eröffnen, wenn sie die nötigen Dokumente erhalte.[43]

Nach dem Amtsantritt der Regierung Gordon Brown verschärfte sich der Konflikt zwischen London und Moskau im Juli 2007. Am 16. Juli wies Großbritannien vier russische Diplomaten aus.[44] Moskau reagierte empört und kündigte „ernsthafte Konsequenzen“ an.[45] Als erster Schritt wurden am 19. Juli vier britische Diplomaten des Landes verwiesen. Außerdem kündigte Russland an, keine neuen Einreise-Visa für britische Amtsträger zu erstellen.[46]
Erklärung der britischen Staatsanwaltschaft [Bearbeiten]

Der Vertreter der königlichen Staatsanwaltschaft (Crown Prosecution Service), Sir Ken Macdonald, erklärte zum Fall Litwinenko:

„Ich habe heute beschlossen, dass die Beweise, die uns von der Polizei übergeben wurden, genügen, um Andrei Lugowoi des Mordes an Herrn Litwinenko mittels absichtlichen Vergiftens zu beschuldigen. Ich habe ferner beschlossen, dass die Strafverfolgung klar im öffentlichen Interesse ist. In dieser Lage habe ich die Mitarbeiter der Staatsanwaltschaft angewiesen unverzüglich Schritte zu unternehmen, um die baldige Auslieferung von Andrei Lugowoi durch Russland an das Vereinigte Königreich zu erreichen, damit er des Mordes angeklagt und schnell vor ein Londoner Gericht gestellt werden kann, um wegen dieses außerordentlich schweren Verbrechens angeklagt zu werden.“[47]

Die Beweislage [Bearbeiten]

Wie die britische Zeitung The Guardian am 23. Mai 2007 berichtete, stützt sich die Anschuldigung gegen Lugowoi vor allem auf die Polonium-Spur, die der mutmaßliche Täter nach der Vergiftung hinterlassen hat.

Der Täter habe sich bei der Vergiftung selbst kontaminiert. In der Folge habe er in Restaurants, Hotelzimmern, Taxis, an Lichtschaltern, Banknoten, Quittungen von Kreditkarten und Flugtickets winzige Spuren von Polonium hinterlassen. Auch Personen, mit denen er in Kontakt gekommen sei, hinterließen danach Polonium-Spuren, allerdings in wesentlich geringerem Umfang. Ebenso scheide das Opfer, vom Zeitpunkt seiner Vergiftung an, über die Schweißdrüsen geringe Mengen Polonium aus.

Alle Polonium-Spuren führten zu Andrei Lugowoi. Dieser habe bei einem Treffen im Millennium Hotel Litwinenko das Polonium in eine Teekanne gegossen, so das Blatt.

Das amerikanische FBI habe Polonium 210, das von Russland aus in die USA exportiert wurde, mit dem Polonium verglichen, mit dem Litwinenko ermordet wurde. Dies versetze die britischen Ermittler in die Lage, sowohl den Reaktor zu identifizieren, aus dem das Polonium stammt, als auch das genaue Datum der Polonium-Produktion zu bestimmen.[48]
Dokumentarfilm zum Fall Litwinenko [Bearbeiten]

Der Filmautor Andrei Nekrassow hat unter dem Titel Rebellion: die Affäre Litwinenko einen Dokumentarfilm zum Fall Litwinenko erstellt. Nekrassow begleitete Litwinenko in den letzten beiden Jahren vor dessen Tod. Der Film wurde am 26. Mai 2007 auf den Filmfestspielen von Cannes im Hauptprogramm außer Konkurrenz gezeigt.[49]

Wikipedia

Alexander Valterovich Litvinenko (Russian: Алекса́ндр Ва́льтерович Литвине́нко) (30 August 1962[1][2] (4 December 1962 by father’s account),[3] – 23 November 2006) was an officer who served in the Soviet KGB and its Russian successor, the Federal Security Service (FSB). In November 1998, Litvinenko and several other FSB officers publicly accused their superiors of ordering the assassination of Russian tycoon and oligarch Boris Berezovsky. Litvinenko was arrested the following March on charges of exceeding his authority at work. He was acquitted in November 1999 but re-arrested before the charges were again dismissed in 2000. He fled with his family to London and was granted asylum in the United Kingdom, where he became a journalist and writer.

During his time in London Litvinenko authored two books, Blowing Up Russia: Terror from Within and Lubyanka Criminal Group, where he accused Russian secret services of staging the Russian apartment bombings and other terrorism acts in an effort to bring Vladimir Putin to power. He also accused Putin of ordering the murder of Russian journalist Anna Politkovskaya.

On 1 November 2006 Litvinenko suddenly fell ill and was hospitalised in what was established as a case of poisoning by radioactive polonium-210 and that resulted in his death on 23 November. The events leading up to his poisoning and death are a matter of controversy, spawning numerous theories relating to his poisoning and death. The British investigation into his death resulted in a failed request to Russia for the extradition of Andrey Lugovoy whom they accused of Litvinenko’s murder, contributing to the further cooling of Russia–United Kingdom relations.

After Litvinenko’s death his widow Marina pursued a vigorous campaign on behalf of her husband through Litvinenko Justice Foundation. In October 2011, she won a right for a full public inquest into Litvinenko’s death to be conducted by a coroner in London.

Alexander Litvinenko was born in the Russian city of Voronezh.[4] After he graduated from a Nalchik secondary school in 1980 he was drafted into the Internal Troops of the Ministry of Internal Affairs as a Private. After a year of service, he matriculated in the Kirov Higher Command School in Vladikavkaz. In 1981, Litvinenko married Nataliya, an accountant, with whom he had a son, Alexander, and a daughter, Sonia. This marriage would later end in divorce in 1994 and in the same year Litvinenko married Marina, a ballroom dancer and fitness instructor, with whom he had a son, Anatoly.[5] After graduation in 1985, Litvinenko became a platoon commander in the Dzerzhinsky Division of the Soviet Ministry of Internal Affairs. He was assigned to the 4th Company, where among his duties was the protection of valuable cargo while in transit.[1][6][7] In 1986 he became an informant when he was recruited by the MVD’s KGB counterintelligence section and in 1988 he was officially transferred to the Third Chief Directorate of the KGB, Military Counter Intelligence.[6] Later that year, after studying for a year at the Novosibirsk Military Counter Intelligence School, he became an operational officer and served in KGB military counterintelligence until 1991.[6][8]

Career in Russian security services

In 1991, he was promoted to the Central Staff of the Federal Counterintelligence Service, specialising in counter-terrorist activities and infiltration of organised crime. He was awarded the title of “MUR veteran” for operations conducted with the Moscow criminal investigation department, the MUR.[9] Litvinenko also saw active military service in many of the so-called “hot spots” of the former USSR and Russia.[10] During the First Chechen War Litvinenko planted several FSB agents in Chechnya. In 1996, Litvinenko also served as a foot soldier during the Russian operation in the Dagestani village of Pervomayskoye, where two of his comrades were killed by friendly fire from the rocket artillery.[citation needed] Although he was oft reported in western media as being a spy, throughout his career he was not an ‘intelligence agent‘ and did not deal with secrets beyond information on operations against organised criminal groups.[6][11][12]

Litvinenko met Boris Berezovsky in 1994 when he took part in investigations into an assassination attempt on the oligarch. He later began to moonlight for Berezovsky where he was responsible for the oligarch’s security.[2][6] The moonlighting by Litvinenko and other security services personnel was illegal, but the state somewhat tolerated it in order to retain personnel who were at the time underpaid.[2][6] Thus, Litvinenko’s moonlighting for the controversial businessman was not investigated, but often investigations in Russia were selective and often targeted only at those who had stepped out of line.[6]

In 1997, Litvinenko was promoted to the FSB Directorate of Analysis and Suppression of Criminal Groups, with the title of senior operational officer and deputy head of the Seventh Section.[13] According to Dimitri Simes, the Directorate was viewed as much as a part of organised crime as it was of law enforcement.[14]

 Claims against FSB leadership

According to his widow Marina, during Litvinenko’s employment in the FSB he discovered numerous connections between top brass of Russian law enforcement agencies and Russian mafia groups, such as the Solntsevo gang, which he detailed in a memorandum to Boris Yeltsin.[when?][citation needed] Berezovsky arranged a meeting for him with FSB Director Mikhail Barsukov and Deputy Director of Internal affairs Ovchinnikov to discuss the alleged corruption problems, with no result, leading him to come to the conclusion that the entire system was corrupt.[15]

In December 1997 Litvinenko claimed he received an order to kill Berezovsky. He did not inform his part-time employer until 20 March 1998.[6][16] According to his widow, on 25 July 1998, the day on which Vladimir Putin replaced Nikolay Kovalyov as the Director of the Federal Security Service, Berezovsky introduced Litvinenko to Putin. Berezovsky claimed that he had helped Putin to take the Director’s position.[17] According to his widow, Litvinenko reported to Putin on corruption in the FSB, but Putin was unimpressed.[17] According to Litvinenko, Putin was involved with a corrupt military general in the Russian army when Putin was a Deputy for Economic Affairs to the Mayor of St. Petersburg. Litvenenko was doing an investigation into the general and Uzbek drug barons and believed that Putin tried to stall the investigation in order to save his reputation.[18]

On 13 November 1998 Berezovsky wrote an open letter to Putin in Kommersant. He accused heads of the Directorate of Analysis and Suppression of Criminal Groups Major-General Yevgeny Khokholkov, N. Stepanov, A. Kamyshnikov, N. Yenin of ordering his assassination.[19]

Four days later Litvinenko and four other officers appeared together in a press conference at the Russian news agency Interfax. All officers worked for both FSB in the Directorate of Analysis and Suppression of Criminal Groups and for Boris Berezovsky.[6] They repeated the allegation made by Berezovsky.[6][16] The officers also claimed they were ordered to kill Mikhail Trepashkin who was also present at the press conference, and to kidnap a brother of the businessman Umar Dzhabrailov.[16]

In 2007, Sergey Dorenko provided The Associated Press and The Wall Street Journal with a complete copy of an April 1998 interview he conducted for ORT television station with Litvinenko and his fellow employees. The interview, of which only excerpts were shown in 1998, shows the FSB officers, who were disguised in masks or dark glasses, claim that their bosses had ordered them to kill, kidnap or frame prominent Russian politicians and businesspeople.

Jim Heintz of The Associated Press opined that although Berezovsky does not appear in the interview, he has an omnipresence in it, given that that officers worked for him, and the interview was taped by Dorenko, a Russian journalist who was an employee of ORT owned in part by Berezovsky.[20]

Dismissal from the FSB

After holding the press conference, Litvinenko was dismissed from the FSB.[21] Putin said later in interview to Yelena Tregubova that he personally ordered the dismissal of Litvinenko, stating “I fired Litvinenko and disbanded his unit …because FSB officers should not stage press conferences. This is not their job. And they should not make internal scandals public.”[22] Litvinenko also believed that Putin was behind his arrest. He said: “Putin had the power to decide whether to pass my file to the prosecutors or not. He always hated me. And there was a bonus for him: by throwing me to the wolves he distanced himself from Boris [Berezovsky] in the eyes of FSB’s generals.”[23]

[edit] Arrest

[icon] This section requires expansion.

He was then arrested twice on charges which were dropped after he had spent time in Moscow prisons.[citation needed] In 1999, he was arrested on charges of abusing duties.[citation needed] He was released a month later after signing a written undertaking not to leave the country.[citation needed] [9]

Flight from Russia and asylum in the United Kingdom

[icon] This section requires expansion.

In October 2000, in violation of an order not to leave Moscow, Litvinenko and his family travelled to Turkey, possibly via Ukraine.[24] While in Turkey, Litvinenko applied for asylum at the United States Embassy in Ankara, but his application was denied.[24] Henry Plater-Zyberk opined that the denial of application may have been based upon on a possible American opinion that Litvinenko’s knowledge was of little benefit and that he might create problems.[6] With the help of Alexander Goldfarb, Litvinenko bought air tickets for the Istanbul-London-Moscow flight,[25] and asked for political asylum at Heathrow Airport during the transit stop on 1 November 2000.[26] Political asylum was granted on 14 May 2001,[27] not because of his knowledge on intelligence matters, but rather on humanitarian grounds.[6] While in London he became a journalist for the separatist Chechenpress and a controversial author, and also joined Berezovsky in campaigning against Putin’s government.[28][29] In October 2006 he became a naturalised British citizen with residence in Whitehaven.[30]

 Alleged career in MI6

On 27 October 2007, the Daily Mail, citing “diplomatic and intelligence sources,” stated that Mr Litvinenko was paid about £2,000 per month by MI6 at the time of his murder. John Scarlett, the head of MI6 (who was once based in Moscow), was allegedly personally involved in recruiting him.[11] The Independent stated that whilst cooperation of Litvinenko with MI6 will likely never be confirmed, a MI6 retainer for Litvinenko suggests systematic cooperation, because MI6 usually makes irregular payments to exiles in exchange for information.[31]

According to Marina Litvinenko, her husband did not work in British secret agencies, but consulted them to combat Russian organized crime in Europe.[32]

Alleged threats against Litvinenko

Former FSB officer Mikhail Trepashkin stated that he had warned in 2002 that an FSB unit was assigned to assassinate Litvinenko.[33] In spite of this, Litvinenko often travelled overseas with no security arrangements, and freely mingled with the Russian community in the United Kingdom, and often received journalists at his home.[6][34] In January 2007, Polish newspaper Dziennik revealed that a target with a photo of Litvinenko on it was used for shooting practice by the Vityaz Training Centre in Balashikha in October 2002.[35] The centre run by Sergey Lyusyuk is not affiliated with the government, and trains bodyguardsdebt collectors and private security forces,[36] although in November 2006 the centre was used by the Vityaz for a qualification examination due to their own centre being under renovation.[36] The targets, which Lyusyuk says were bought in the Olympic Market, were also photographed when the chairman of the Federation Council of Russia Sergei Mironov visited the centre and met Lyusyuk on 7 November 2006.[35][36] When asked why the photographs of Mironov’s visit were removed from the centre’s website Lyusyuk stated “(t)hose Poles are up to something” and added that Mironov didn’t see the targets and knew nothing about them.[36]

Alleged blackmail activities

According to Julia Svetlichnaya, a Russian doctoral candidate at the University of Westminster‘s Center for the Study of Democracy, Litvinenko told her that he was planning to blackmail or sell sensitive information on a wide range of people, including oligarchs, allegedly corrupt official and figures within the Kremlin hierarchy, in which he would extort £10,000 per instance to have him stop publication of alleged documents. Svetlichnaya noted that Litvinenko didn’t have a steady income and was certain he could obtain the necessary files for this purpose.[37] According to The Observer, Litvinenko’s alleged threats and access to FSB materials might have turned him into an enemy of big business and the Kremlin.[37]

 Conviction in Russia

In 2002 he was convicted in absentia in Russia and given a three and a half year jail sentence.[38]

Allegations

Litvinenko told anyone who would listen about his theories relating to the power structures in Russia, and would bombard his contacts with relating to his conspiracy theories.[6][34][39] In a report for the Conflict Studies Research CentreHenry Plater-Zyberk, a lecturer at the Defence Academy of the United Kingdom and Russian politics expert, described Litvinenko as a one-man disinformation bureau, who was at first guided by Berezovsky but later in possible pursuit of attention for himself. Plater-Zyberk notes that Litvinenko made numerous accusations without presenting any evidence to give credence to his claims, and these claims which became increasingly outlandish were often accepted by the British media without question.[6] According to Michael Mainville, Litvinenko knew the secret to a conspiracy theory is that they are based upon an absence of proof, and that the more outlandish the claim, the harder it is to disprove.[39] This has led to some political analysts dismissing his claims as those of a fantasist.[37]

Armenian parliament shooting

Litvinenko accused the Main Intelligence Directorate of the General-Staff of the Russian armed forces had organised the 1999 Armenian parliament shooting that killed Prime Minister of Armenia Vazgen Sargsyan and seven members of parliament, ostensibly to derail the peace process which would have resolved the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict, but he offered no evidence to support the accusation.[6][40][41] The Russian embassy in Armenia denied any such involvement, and described Litvinenko’s accusation as an attempt to harm relations between Armenia and Russia by people against the democratic reforms in Russia.[42]

Russian apartment bombings

Litvinenko alleged that agents from the FSB coordinated the 1999 Russian apartment bombings that killed more than 300 people, whereas Russian officials blamed the explosions on Chechen separatists. This version of events was suggested earlier by David Satter,[43] and Sergei Yushenkovvice chairman of the Sergei Kovalev commission created by the Russian Parliament to investigate the bombings.[citation needed]

 Moscow theatre hostage crisis

In a 2003 interview with the Australian SBS TV network, and aired on Dateline, Litvinenko claimed that two of the Chechen terrorists involved in the 2002 Moscow theatre siege — whom he named as “Abdul the Bloody” and “Abu Bakar” — were working for the FSB, and that the agency manipulated the rebels into staging the attack.[44] Litvinenko said: “[w]hen they tried to find [Abdul the Bloody and Abu Bakar] among the dead terrorists, they weren’t there. The FSB got its agents out. So the FSB agents among Chechens organized the whole thing on FSB orders, and those agents were released.” This echoed similar claims made by Mikhail Trepashkin.[45] The leading role of an FSB agent Khanpasha Terkibaev (the “Abu Bakar”) was also described by Anna PolitkovskayaIvan Rybkin and Alexander Khinshtein.[46][47][48][49] In the beginning of April 2003 Litvinenko gave “the Terkibaev file” to Sergei Yushenkov when he visited London, who in turn passed it to Anna Politkovskaya.[22] A few days later Yushenkov was assassinated. Terkibaev was later killed in Chechnya. According to speaker of Russian State Duma Ivan Rybkin, “The authorities failed to keep [the FSB agent] Terkibaev out of public view, and that is why he was killed. I know how angry people were, because they knew Terkibaev had authorization from presidential administration.” [50]

Beslan school hostage crisis

Alexander Litvinenko suggested in September 2004 that the Russian secret services must have been aware of the plot beforehand, and therefore that they must have themselves organized the attack as a false flag operation. He spoke in an interview before his death with Chechenpress news agency, and said that because the hostage takers had previously been in FSB custody for committing terrorist attacks, it is inconceivable that they would have been released and still been able to carry out attacks independently. He said that they would only have been freed if they were of use to the FSB, and that even in the case that they were freed without being turned into FSB assets, they would be under a strict surveillance regime that would not have allowed them to carry out the Beslan attack unnoticed.[51] Ella Kesayeva, co-chair of the group Voice of Beslan, formalized Litvinenko’s argument in a November 2008 article in Novaya Gazeta, noting the large number of hostage takers who were in government custody not long before attacking the school, and coming to the same conclusion that Beslan was a false flag attack.[52]

 Support of terrorism worldwide by the KGB and FSB

Litvinenko stated that “all the bloodiest terrorists of the world” were connected to FSB-KGB, including Carlos “The Jackal” RamírezYassir ArafatSaddam HusseinAbdullah ÖcalanWadie Haddad of the Popular Front for the Liberation of PalestineGeorge Hawi who led the Communist Party of LebanonEzekias Papaioannou from Cyprus, Sean Garland from Ireland and many others.” He says that all of them were trained, funded, and provided with weapons, explosives and counterfeit documents in order to carry out terrorist attacks worldwide and that each act of terrorism made by these people was carried out according to the task and under the rigid control of the KGB of the USSR.[53] Litvinenko said that “the center of global terrorism is not in Iraq, Iran, Afghanistan or the Chechen Republic. The terrorism infection creeps away worldwide from the cabinets of the Lubyanka Square and the Kremlin”.[54][55]

Alleged Russia-al-Qaeda connection

In a July 2005 interview with the Polish newspaper Rzeczpospolita, Litvinenko alleged that Ayman al-Zawahiri, a prominent leader of al-Qaeda, was trained for half of a year by the FSB in Dagestan in 1997 and called him “an old agent of the FSB”.[53][56] Litvinenko said that after this training, al-Zawahiri “was transferred to Afghanistan, where he had never been before and where, following the recommendation of his Lubyanka chiefs, he at once … penetrated the milieu of Osama bin Laden and soon became his assistant in Al Qaeda.” [57] Former KGB officer and writer Konstantin Preobrazhenskiy supported this claim and said that Litvinenko “was responsible for securing the secrecy of Al-Zawahiri’s arrival in Russia; he was trained by FSB instructors in Dagestan, Northern Caucasus, in 1996-1997.”.[58] He said: “At that time, Litvinenko was the Head of the Subdivision for Internationally Wanted Terrorists of the First Department of the Operative-Inquiry Directorate of the FSB Anti-Terrorist Department. He was ordered to undertake the delicate mission of securing Al-Zawahiri from unintentional disclosure by the Russian police. Though Al-Zawahiri had been brought to Russia by the FSB using a false passport, it was still possible for the police to learn about his arrival and report to Moscow for verification. Such a process could disclose Al-Zawahiri as an FSB collaborator. In order to prevent this, Litvinenko visited a group of the highly placed police officers to notify them in advance.” According to FSB spokesman Sergei Ignatchenko, al-Zawahiri was arrested by Russian authorities in Dagestan in December 1996 and released in May 1997.[59]

When asked in an interview who he thought the originator of the 2005 bombings in London was, Litvinenko responded saying[53] “You know, I have spoken about it earlier and I shall say now, that I know only one organization, which has made terrorism the main tool of solving of political problems. It is the Russian special services.”

On 1 September 2005, al-Zawahiri and Mohammad Sidique Khan claimed responsibility for the attacks for Al Qaeda on a video tape which aired on al-Jazeera.[60]

Danish cartoon controversy

According to Litvinenko, the 2005 controversy over the publication in the Danish newspaper Jyllands-Posten of editorial cartoons depicting the Islamic prophet Muhammad was orchestrated by the FSB to punish Denmark for its refusal to extradite Chechen separatists.[39]

Assassination of Anna Politkovskaya

Two weeks before his poisoning, Alexander Litvinenko accused Vladimir Putin of ordering the assassination of Russian journalist Anna Politkovskaya and stated that a former presidential candidate Irina Hakamada warned Politkovskaya about threats to her life coming from the Russian president. Litvinenko advised Politkovskaya to escape from Russia immediately. Hakamada denied her involvement in passing any specific threats, and said that she warned Politkovskaya only in general terms more than a year ago.[61] It remains unclear if Litvinenko referred to an earlier statement made by Boris Berezovsky who claimed that former Deputy Prime Minister of Russia Boris Nemtsov received a word from Hakamada that Putin threatened her and like-minded colleagues in person. According to Berezovsky, Putin uttered that Hakamada and her colleagues “will take in the head immediately, literally, not figuratively” if they “open the mouth” about the Russian apartment bombings.[62]

Allegations concerning Romano Prodi

According to Litvinenko, FSB deputy chief, General Anatoly Trofimov said to him “Don’t go to Italy, there are many KGB agents among the politicians. Romano Prodi is our man there”,[63][64] meaning Romano Prodi, the Italian centre-left leader, former Prime Minister of Italy and former President of the European Commission. The conversation with Trofimov took place in 2000, after the Prodi-KGB scandal broke out in October 1999 due to information about Prodi provided by Vasili Mitrokhin.[17]

In April 2006, a British Member of the European Parliament for London, Gerard Batten of the United Kingdom Independence Party (UKIP) demanded an inquiry into the allegations.[63][64] According to Brussels-based newspaper, the EU Reporter on 3 April 2006, “another high-level source, a former KGB operative in London, has confirmed the story”.[65] On 26 April 2006, Batten repeated his call for a parliamentary inquiry, revealing that “former, senior members of the KGB are willing to testify in such an investigation, under the right conditions.” He added, “It is not acceptable that this situation is unresolved, given the importance of Russia’s relations with the European Union.”[66] On 22 January 2007, the BBC and ITV News released documents and video footage, from February 2006, in which Litvinenko repeated his statements about Prodi.[67][68]

A report by the Conflict Studies Research Centre of the Defence Academy of the United Kingdom from May 2007 noted that Trofimov was never the head of the FSB, which did not oversee intelligence operations, had never worked in the intelligence directorate of the KGB or its successor the SVR, nor had he worked in the counterintelligence department of the intelligence services, nor had he ever worked in Italy, making it difficult to understand how Trofimov would have had knowledge about such a recruitment. Henry Plater-Zyberk, the co-author of the report suggested that Trofimov was “conveniently dead”, so “could neither confirm nor deny the story”, and noted Litvinenko’s history of making accusations without evidence to back them up.[6]

Cooperation with Spanish authorities

Shortly before his death Litvinenko tipped off Spanish authorities on several organised crime bosses with links to Spain. During a meeting in May 2006 he allegedly provided security officials with information on the locations, roles, and activities of several “Russian” mafia figures with ties to Spain, including IzguilovZahkar Kalashov, and Tariel Oniani.[69]

 Other allegations

In his book Gang from Lubyanka, Litvinenko alleged that Vladimir Putin during his time at the FSB was personally involved in protecting the drug trafficking from Afghanistan organized by Abdul Rashid Dostum [2]. In December 2003 Russian authorities confiscated over 4000 copies of the book.[70]

Litvinenko commented on a new law that “Russia has the right to carry out preemptive strikes on militant bases abroad” and explained that these “preemptive strikes may involve anything, except nuclear weapons,” Litvinenko said that “You know who they mean when they say ‘terrorist bases abroad’? They mean us, Zakayev and Boris, and me.”.[22] He also said that “It was considered in our service that poison is an easier weapon than a pistol.” He referred to a secret laboratory in Moscow that still continues development of deadly poisons, according to him.[71]

In an article written by Litvinenko in July 2006, and published online on Zakayev’s Chechenpress website, he claimed that Vladimir Putin is a paedophile.[72] Litvinenko also claimed that Anatoly Trofimov and Artyom Borovik knew of the alleged paedophilia.[73] The claims have been called “wild”,[34] and “sensational and unsubstantiated”[74] in the British media. Litvinenko made the allegation after Putin kissed a boy on his belly while stopping to chat with some tourists during a walk in the Kremlin grounds on 28 June 2006.[74] The incident was recalled in a webcast organised by the BBC and Yandex, in which over 11,000 people asked Putin to explain the act, to which he responded, “He seemed very independent and serious… I wanted to cuddle him like a kitten and it came out in this gesture. He seemed so nice…There is nothing behind it.”[75] It has been suggested that the incident was a “clumsy attempt” to soften Putin’s image in the lead-up the 32nd G8 Summit which was held in Saint Petersburg in July 2006.[74]

 Poisoning and death

Alexander Litvinenko at University College Hospital

On 1 November 2006, Litvinenko suddenly fell ill and was hospitalised. His illness was later attributed to poisoning with radionuclide polonium-210 after the Health Protection Agency found significant amounts of the rare and highly toxic element in his body. In interviews, Litvinenko stated that he met with two former KGB agents early on the day he fell ill - Dmitry Kovtun and Andrei Lugovoi. Though both denied any wrongdoing, a leaked US diplomatic cable revealed that Kovtun had left Polonium traces in the house and car he had used in Hamburg [3]. The men also introduced Litvinenko to a tall, thin man of central Asian appearance called ‘Vladislav Sokolenko’ who Lugovoi said was a business partner. Lugovoi is also a former bodyguard of Russian ex-Acting Prime minister Yegor Gaidar (who also suffered from a mysterious illness in November 2006). Later, he had lunch at Itsu, a sushi restaurant in Piccadilly in London, with an Italian acquaintance and nuclear waste expert, Mario Scaramella, to whom he made the allegations regarding Italy’s Prime Minister Romano Prodi.[76] Scaramella, attached to the Mitrokhin Commission investigating KGB penetration of Italian politics, claimed to have information on the assassination of Anna Politkovskaya, 48, a journalist who was killed at her Moscow apartment in October 2006.

Marina Litvinenko, widow of the deceased, accused Moscow of orchestrating the murder. Though she believes the order did not come from Putin himself, she does believe it was done at the behest of the authorities, and announced that she will refuse to provide evidence to any Russian investigation out of fear that it would be misused or misrepresented.[77]

 Conversion to Sunni Islam

Two days before his death Litvinenko informed his father that he had converted to Sunni Islam. Litvinenko’s conversion to Sunni Islam and the related wish for Muslim funeral rites were recognized by his father. Goldfarb stated, “Unfortunately some people appeared and against the explicit wishes of the widow performed Muslim rites over the funeral. We had a choice to turn it into an unseemly situation, but Marina asked us to respect the memory of Alexander and let these people do what they did. Let God be their judge.” Ghayasuddin Siddiqui, head of the Muslim Parliament of Great Britain, contended that Litvineko actually converted to Sunni Islam 10 days before he was poisoned.[78][79][80] Akhmed Zakayev, Foreign Minister of Chechen government-in-exile who lived next door to Mr Litvinenko and considered him “like a brother,”[81] said: “He was read to from the Qur’an the day before he died and had told his wife and family that he wanted to be buried in accordance with Muslim tradition.”[82] The ceremony was followed by a private memorial at which the ensemble Tonus Peregrinus sang sacred music by Russian composers Igor StravinskySergei RachmaninovVictor Kalinnikov, and three works by British composer Antony Pitts.[83]

 Death and last statement

On 22 November Litvinenko’s medical staff at University College Hospital reported he had suffered a “major setback” due to either heart failure or an overnight heart attack. He died on 23 November, and Scotland Yard stated that inquiries into the circumstances of how Litvinenko became ill would continue.[84]

On 24 November a posthumous statement was released, in which Litvinenko directly accused Vladimir Putin of poisoning him. Litvinenko’s friend Alex Goldfarb, who is also the chairman of Boris Berezovsky‘s Civil Liberties Fund, claimed Litvinenko had dictated it to him three days earlier. Andrei Nekrasov said his friend Litvinenko and Litvinenko’s lawyer composed the statement in Russian on 21 November and translated it to English.[85]

Putin disputed the authenticity of this note while attending a Russia-EU summit in Helsinki and claimed it was being used for political purposes.[86][87] William Dunkerley, in a briefing from May 2007 for a round table which discussed Litvinenko’s case and the way it was handled by the Russian and Western media, called into question the authenticity of the statement, noting that the statement did not read like a statement made on one’s deathbed and was typed in English, a language which Litvinenko was far from proficient in, with the signature and date handwritten.[28] Goldfarb later stated that Litvinenko instructed him to write a note “in good English” in which Putin was to be accused of his poisoning. Goldfarb also stated that he read the note to Litvinenko in English and Russian, to which he claims Litvinenko agreed “with every word of it” and signed it.[88]

Grave of Alexander Litvinenko at Highgate Cemetery

His postmortem took place on 1 December at the Royal London Hospital’s institute of pathology. It was attended by three physicians, including one chosen by the family and one from the Foreign Office.[89] Litvinenko was buried at Highgate Cemetery (West side) in north London on 7 December.[90] The police are treating his death as murder.[91] On 25 November, two days after Litvinenko’s death, an article attributed to him was published by The Mail on Sunday entitled “Why I believe Putin wanted me dead”.[92]

In an interview with the BBC broadcast on 16 December 2006, Yuri Shvets said that Litvinenko had created a ‘due diligence‘ report investigating the activities of a senior Kremlin official on behalf of a British company looking to invest “dozens of millions of dollars” in a project in Russia. He said the dossier was so incriminating about the senior Kremlin official, who was not named, it was likely that Litvinenko was murdered out of spite. He alleged that Litvinenko had shown the dossier to another business associate, Andrei Lugovoi, who had worked for the KGB and later the FSB. Shvets alleged that Lugovoi is still an FSB informant and he had spread copies of the dossier to members of the spy service. He said he was interviewed about his allegations by Scotland Yard detectives investigating Litvinenko’s murder. Shvets has also doubted Litvinenko’s capacity to perform honest unbiased due diligence.[93] The poisoning and consequent death of Litvinenko was not widely covered in the Russian news media.[94]

According to Mary Dejevsky, the chief editorial writer of The Independent, the view that the British public had of Litvinenko’s illness and death was essentially dictated by Berezovsky, who funded an expertly conducted publicity campaign.[95]

Theories and investigations into death

UK criminal investigation

On 20 January 2007 British police announced that they have “identified the man they believe poisoned Alexander Litvinenko. The suspected killer was captured on cameras at Heathrow as he flew into Britain to carry out the murder.”[96] The man in question was introduced to Litvinenko as ‘Vladislav’.

As of 26 January 2007, British officials said police had solved the murder of Litvinenko. They discovered “a ‘hot’ teapot at London’s Millennium Hotel with an off-the-charts reading for polonium-210, the radioactive material used in the killing.” In addition, a senior official said investigators had concluded the murder of Litvinenko was “a ‘state-sponsored’ assassination orchestrated by Russian security services.” The police want to charge former Russian spy Andrei Lugovoi, who met with Litvinenko on 1 November 2006, the day officials believe the lethal dose of polonium-210 was administered. [97]

On the same day, The Guardian reported that the British government was preparing an extradition request asking that Andrei Lugovoi be returned to the UK to stand trial for Litvinenko’s murder.[98] On 22 May 2007 the Crown Prosecution Service called for the extradition of Russian citizen Andrei Lugovoi to the UK on charges of murder. [99] Lugovoi dismissed the claims against him as “politically motivated” and said he did not kill Litvinenko. [100]

A British police investigation resulted in several suspects for the murder, but in May 2007, the British Director of Public ProsecutionsKen Macdonald, announced that his government would seek to extradite Andrei Lugovoi, the chief suspect of the case, from Russia. [101] On 28 May 2007, the British Foreign Office officially submitted a request to the Government of Russia for the extradition of Lugovoi to face criminal charges in the UK. [102]

On 2 October 2011, The Sunday Times published an article wherein the chief prosecutor who investigated the murder of Litvinenko, Lord Macdonald of River Glaven, publicly spoke of his suspicion that the murder was a “state directed execution” carried out by Russia. Until that time, British public officials had stopped short of directly accusing Russia of involvement in the poisoning. “It had all the hallmarks of a state directed execution, committed on the streets of London by a foreign government,” Macdonald added.[103]

Russian criminal investigation

Many publications in Russian media suggested that the death of Alexander Litvinenko was connected to Boris Berezovsky.[104][105] Former FSB chief Nikolay Kovalyov, for whom Litvinenko worked, said that the incident “looks like the hand of Boris Berezovsky. I am sure that no kind of intelligence services participated.”[106] This involvement of Berezovsky was alleged by numerous Russian television shows. Kremlin supporters saw it as a conspiracy to smear Russian government’s reputation by engineering a spectacular murder of a Russian dissident abroad.[107]

After Litvinenko’s death, traces of polonium-210 were found in an office of Berezovsky.[108] Litvinenko had visited Berezovsky’s office as well as many other places in the hours after his poisoning.[109] The British Health Protection Agency made extensive efforts to ensure that locations Litvinenko visited and anyone who had contact with Litvinenko after his poisoning, were not at risk.[110]

Russian prosecutors were not allowed to investigate the office.[111] Russian authorities have also been unable to question Berezovsky. The Foreign Ministry complained that Britain was obstructing its attempt to send prosecutors to London to interview more than 100 people, including Berezovsky.[112]

On 5 July 2007, Russia officially declined to extradite Lugovoi, citing that extradition of citizens is not allowed under the Russian constitution. Russia has said that they could take on the case themselves if Britain provided evidence against Lugovoi but Britain has not handed over any evidence. The head of the investigating committee at the General Prosecutor’s Office said Russia has not yet received any evidence from Britain on Lugovoi. “We have not received any evidence from London of Lugovoi’s guilt, and those documents we have are full of blank spaces and contradictions.[113] However the British ambassador to RussiaAnne Pringle, claimed that London has already submitted sufficient evidence to extradite him to Britain.[114]

Judicial Inquiries

Inquest in London

On October 13, 2011 Dr. Andrew Reed, the Coroner of St. Pancras announced that he will hold a full public inquest into Litvinenko’s death, which will include the examination of all existing theories of the murder, including possible complicity of Russian government.[115]

 Litvinenko vs Russian Federation in Strasbourg

In May 2007 Marina Litvinenko registered a complaint against Russian Federation in the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg accusing RF of violating her husband’s right to life, and failing to conduct full investigation.[116] References in popular culture

 References

  1. a b Penketh, Anne (25 November 2006). “Alexander Litvinenko”. London: The Independenthttp://www.independent.co.uk/news/obituaries/alexander-litvinenko-425720.html. Retrieved 16 March 2010.  (Archived at WebCite)
  2. a b c “Aleksandr Litvinenko”Russia Todayhttp://rt.com/Russia_Now/Russiapedia/Those_Russians/laleksandr-litvinenko.html. Retrieved 6 April 2010.  (Archived at WebCite)
  3. ^ Вальтер Литвиненко: «Сегодня моему сыну исполнилось бы 44», Вальтер Александрович Литвиненко, 4 декабря 2006 г., ChechenPress
  4. ^ “Alexander Litvinenko”. London: The Daily Telegraph. 25 November 2006. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/obituaries/1535094/Alexander-Litvinenko.html. Retrieved 16 March 2010.  (Archived at WebCite)
  5. ^ Oxford Dictionary of National Biography
  6. a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q Monaghan, Dr Andrew; Plater Zyberk, Henry (22 May 2007). “Misunderstanding Russia: Alexander Litvinenko” (PDF). The UK & Russia — A Troubled Relationship Part IConflict Studies Research Centre of the Defence Academy of the United Kingdom. pp. 9–12. ISBN 9781905962150http://www.da.mod.uk/colleges/arag/document-listings/russian/07%2817%29AM.pdf. Retrieved 2010-03-16.  (Archived at WebCite)
  7. ^ “Alexander Litvinenko”. London: The Times. 25 November 2006. http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,60-2470058,00.html. Retrieved 2010-03-16.  (Archived at WebCite)
  8. ^ (Russian)Александр Подрабинек (2002-10-10). “Офицер ФСБ дает показания”. Агентство ПРИМА. http://www.prima-news.ru/news/articles/2002/10/10/17299.html.
  9. a b Thomas, D.M. (1998). Alexander Solzhenitsyn – A Century In His Life. New York: St. Martinj’s Press. pp. 583.
  10. ^ ”In Memoriam Aleksander Litvinenko.” Dir. Jose De Putter. VPRO Backlight, 2007. Documentary.[1]
  11. a b Wright, Stephen; Williams, David (27 October 2007). “Revealed: Poisoned ex-Russian spy Litvinenko WAS a paid-up MI6 agent”. London: Daily Mailhttp://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-490007/Revealed-Poisoned-ex-Russian-spy-Litvinenko-WAS-paid-MI6-agent.html. Retrieved 16 March 2010.  (Archived at WebCite)
  12. ^ “Russian authorities likely behind Litvinenko’s death, his wife says”LondonInternational Herald Tribune. 10 December 2006. http://www.iht.com/articles/ap/2006/12/10/europe/EU_GEN_Britain_Poisoned_Spy_Wife.php. Retrieved 16 March 2010.  (Archived at Wayback Machine)
  13. ^ (Russian) Vinogradskaya, Natalya (30 November 2006). “Радиоактивные политтехнологии: смерть Литвиненко осложнила проведение саммита Россия-ЕС”. “What the Papers Say” Agency. http://www.wps.ru/ru/pp/tv-review/2006/11/30.html. Retrieved 16 March 2010.  (Archived at WebCite)
  14. ^ Simes, Dimitri (12 June 2006). “Litvinenko: Kremlin Conspiracy or Blofeld Set-Up?”The National Interesthttp://www.nationalinterest.org/BlogSE.aspx?id=13150. Retrieved 2010-03-16.  (Archived at WebCite)
  15. ^ Death of a dissident, page 39-41.
  16. a b c (Russian)“Березовский и УРПО / дело Литвиненко”. “Агентура.Ру”. 27 November 2006. http://www.agentura.ru/timeline/1998/urpo/. Retrieved 2006-11-30.
  17. a b c Death of a Dissident, page 136
  18. ^ Litvinenko, Alexander (25 November 2006). “Why I believe Putin wanted me dead…”Daily Mailhttp://www.mailonsunday.co.uk/news/article-418652/Why-I-believe-Putin-wanted-dead-.html. Retrieved 2011-12-16.
  19. ^ (Russian) Berezovsky, Boris (13 November 1998). “Березовский (signed 11 November 1998)”Kommersanthttp://www.kommersant.ru/doc/208710. Retrieved 2011-12-16.
  20. ^ Heintz, Jim (23 May 2007). “1998 Tape Shows Russian Ex-Spy Fearful”Associated Press, via Washington Posthttp://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/05/23/AR2007052300397_pf.html. Retrieved 2009-03-16.
  21. ^ “Russia ready to cooperate with Britain on Litvinenko case — FSB”RIA Novosti. 18 May 2008. http://en.rian.ru/russia/20080518/107675252.html. Retrieved 2009-03-16.
  22. a b c Alex Goldfarb and Marina Litvinenko. Death of a Dissident: The Poisoning of Alexander Litvinenko and the Return of the KGB, The Free Press (2007) ISBN 1-416-55165-4
  23. ^ Death of a dissident, page 160.
  24. a b Cowell, Alan; Shane, Scott; Myers, Steven Lee; Klimenko, Viktor (3 November 2006). “Alexander Litvinenko lived and died in world of violence and betrayal”London/Washington, D.C./MoscowInternational Herald Tribunehttp://www.nytimes.com/2006/12/03/world/europe/03iht-spy.3760139.html?pagewanted=all. Retrieved 6 April 2010.  (Archived at WebCite)
  25. ^ (Russian) Dmitriyeva, Olga (30 March 2002). “Александр Литвиненко: ярлык предателя не радует”LondonRossiyskaya Gazetahttp://www.rg.ru/Anons/arc_2002/0330/hit.shtm. Retrieved 6 April 2010.  (Archived at WebCite)
  26. ^ “Литвиненко получил убежище в Британии?”BBC Russian Service. 15 May 2001. http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/russian/news/newsid_1331000/1331949.stm. Retrieved 6 April 2010.  (Archived at WebCite)
  27. ^ (Russian)“Заявление Александра Литвиненко”lenta.ru. 15 May 2006. http://www.lenta.ru/world/2001/05/15/litvinenko/statement.htm. Retrieved 2006-11-24.
  28. a b Dunkerley, William (25 May 2007). “The Essence of the Alexander Litvinenko Story”Russia Profilehttp://www.russiaprofile.org/page.php?pageid=Politics&articleid=a1180613251. Retrieved 2010-03-16.  (Archived at WebCite
  29. ^ Sakwa, Richard (2008). Putin, Russia’s choice (2nd ed.). Routledge. pp. 158–159. ISBN 978-0-415-40765-6.
  30. ^ Evans, Michael; McGrory, Daniel; Delaney, Sarah (22 November 2006). “Litvinenko was told that he was marked for death”. London: Timeshttp://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,3-2465271,00.html. Retrieved 2006-11-24.
  31. ^ “The Litvinenko files: MI6″. London: The Independent. 2 May 2008. http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/the-litvinenko-files-mi6-819537.html. Retrieved 2009-03-16.
  32. ^ http://english.ruvr.ru/2011/10/17/58864214.html
  33. ^ Isachenkov, Vladimir (1 December 2006). “Ex-Spy Claims Litvinenko Was Targeted”. Washington Post. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/12/01/AR2006120100452.html. Retrieved 2006-12-01.
  34. a b c Svetlichnaya, Julia (3 December 2006). “Strange stroll around Hyde Park that went nowhere”. London: The Observerhttp://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2006/dec/03/world.russia2. Retrieved 2010-04-06.  (Archived at WebCite)
  35. a b Russian special forces shot at Litvinenko, Dariusz Rembelski, Magdalena Miroszewska, Dziennik Online, 30 January 2007.
  36. a b c d Voronov, Alexander; Chistyakova, Marina; Barakhova, Alla (31 January 2007). “Litvinenko Shooting Gallery”Kommersanthttp://www.kommersant.com/p738293/r_530/Litvinenko_Shooting_Gallery/. Retrieved 6 April 2010.  (Archived at WebCite)
  37. a b c Townsend, Mark; Doward, Jamie; Parfitt, Tom; McMahon, Barbara (3 December 2006). “Revealed: Litvinenko’s Russian ‘blackmail plot’”. London: The Observerhttp://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2006/dec/03/russia.world. Retrieved 2010-04-06.  (Archived at WebCite)
  38. ^ Alexander Litvinenko The Guardian Retrieved on 5 April 2008
  39. a b c Mainville, Michael (14 December 2006). “From Russia with lies”MoscowSalon.comhttp://www.salon.com/news/feature/2006/12/14/litvinenko/. Retrieved 6 April 2010.  (Archived at WebCite)
  40. ^ (Russian) “Список киллеров ФСБ”. Реальный Азербайджан. 29 April 2005. Archived from the original on 2005-11-04. http://web.archive.org/web/20051104110225/http://realazer.com/_3/index.html. Retrieved 2009-02-16.
  41. ^ “Shooting of the Armenian Parliament was organized by Russian special services”. AZG Daily. 3 May 2005. http://www.azg.am/EN/2005050307. Retrieved 6 April 2010.  (Archived at Freezepage.com)
  42. ^ ”Russian embassy denies special services’ part in Armenian parliament shooting”. ITAR-TASS. 12 May 2005.
  43. ^ Satter, David (13 November 2006). “The Truth About Beslan”The Weekly Standardhttp://www.weeklystandard.com/print/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/012/907jbmkm.asp. Retrieved 6 April 2010.  (Archived at WebCite)
  44. ^ Lazaredes, Nick (4 June 2003). “Terrorism takes front stage — Russia’s theatre siege”Datelinehttp://news.sbs.com.au/dateline/russia__terrorism_takes_front_stage_130217. Retrieved 2008-11-13. [dead link]
  45. ^ Dissident lawyer jailed on trumped up charges
  46. ^ Mysterious figure implicated in Russian theater tragedy
  47. ^ Where is “Abubakar?”
  48. ^ Russian Authorities Hedge Over Special Services Involvement In Moscow Theater Siege, by Anna PolitkovskayaNovaya Gazeta, 5 May 2003
  49. ^ The Moscow Hostage-Taking Incident (Part 1) By John B. Dunlop, Radio Free Europe
  50. ^ Anna Politkovskaya A Russian Diary: A Journalist’s Final Account of Life, Corruption, and Death in Putin’s Russia, Random House, New York, 2007, ISBN 978-1-4000-6682-7, page 56.
  51. ^ A. Litvinenko: “The identities of the terrorists prove 100% the participation of the FSB in the seizure of the school in Beslan”Chechenpress, 8 September 2004
  52. ^ (Russian) Kesayeva, Ella (20 November 2008). “Террористы-агенты – Неизвестные подробности бесланской трагедии”Novaya Gazetahttp://www.novayagazeta.ru/data/2008/86/00.html. Retrieved 6 April 2010.  (Archived at WebCite)
  53. a b c The originator of the acts of terrorism in London was standing near Tony Blair Retrieved on 3 April 2008
  54. ^ “The originator of the acts of terrorism in London was standing near Tony Blair”. 19 July 2005. http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/regions/london/2005/07/318875.html. Retrieved 2006-11-30.
  55. ^ Litvinenko, Alexander (23 March 2005). “The KGBism, Terrorism and Gangsterism are Triplets”. Chechen Press. http://www.chechenpress.info/english/news/2005/03/23/03.shtml. Retrieved 2006-12-07.
  56. ^ Nyquist, J.R. (20 November 2006). “Kremlin Poison”. Financial Sense Online. http://www.financialsense.com/stormwatch/geo/pastanalysis/2006/1120.html. Retrieved 2006-11-21.
  57. ^ Nyquist, J.R. (13 August 2005). “Is Al Qaeda a Kremlin Proxy?”http://www.jrnyquist.com/nyquist_2005_0813.htm. Retrieved 2006-11-29.
  58. ^ Russia and Islam are not Separate: Why Russia backs Al-Qaeda, by Konstantin Preobrazhensky.
  59. ^ Gebara, Khalil (10 February 2005). “The End of Egyptian Islamic Jihad?”. The Jamestown Foundation. Archived from the original on November 21, 2006. http://web.archive.org/web/20061121012526/http://www.jamestown.org/publications_details.php?volume_id=411&issue_id=3228&article_id=2369243. Retrieved 2006-12-07.
  60. ^ London bomber: Text in full BBC News Retrieved on 3 April 2008
  61. ^ (Russian)“Ирина Хакамада о партийном строительстве и экономической ситуации в России”. Svoboda News. 4 December 2006. http://www.svobodanews.ru/Transcript/2006/12/04/20061204200017950.html. Retrieved 2006-12-07.
  62. ^ Live interview with Berezovsky by Evgenia Albats, Radio Echo of Moscow, 11 June 2006. Transcript in Russiancomputer translation.
  63. a b “Gerard Battem, One-minute speeches on matters of political importance”. European Parliament, Debates. 3 April 2006. http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//TEXT+CRE+20060403+ITEM-008+DOC+XML+V0//EN&language=EN&query=INTERV&detail=1-060. Retrieved 2008-03-13.
  64. a b “Former FSB General, Wife Shot Dead in Moscow”. Mosnews.com. 11 April 2005. http://www.mosnews.com/news/2005/04/11/fsbhit.shtml. Retrieved 2006-11-21.
  65. ^ Donnelly, Cillian (3 April 2006). “Prodi Accused Of Being Former Soviet Agent”. EU Reporter. Archived from the original on May 24, 2006. http://web.archive.org/web/20060524063146/http://www.eureporter.co.uk/showarticle.php?newsid=2218. Retrieved 2006-11-21.
  66. ^ Batten, Gerard (26 April 2006). “2006: Speech in the European Parliament: Romano Prodi”Gerard Batten MEP. http://www.gerardbattenmep.co.uk/search.php?misc=search&subaction=showfull&id=1146224529&archive=&cnshow=news&start_from=&%5C%22to_date_day%5C%22=&TB=home5. Retrieved 2006-11-21.
  67. ^ “‘Multiple attempts’ on Litvinenko”. BBC. 22 January 2007. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/6285631.stm. Retrieved 2007-03-01.
  68. ^ “Litvinenko footage emerges”ITV News. 22 January 2007. http://www.itv.com/news/index_de20839cb1d32bc0891bbbd13c6a4c1e.html. Retrieved 2007-03-01.
  69. ^ Tremlett, Giles (1 December 2010). “US embassy cables: Spain’s investigations into the Russian mafia”The Guardianhttp://www.guardian.co.uk/world/us-embassy-cables-documents/223006. Retrieved 12 December 2010.
  70. ^ “Russian editor questioned over seizure of controversial book (BBC Monitoring Former Soviet Union, text of report by Russian news agency Ekho Moskvy )”. Terror 99. 29 January 2004. http://eng.terror99.ru/publications/133.htm. Retrieved 2006-12-23.
  71. ^ Litvinenko’s Poisoning: Detailed Unfolding of Events
  72. ^ Litvinenko, Alexander (5 July 2006). “The Kremlin Pedophile”Chechenpresshttp://www.chechenpress.co.uk/english/news/2006/07/05/01.shtml. Retrieved 2008-11-11.
  73. ^ (Russian) Litvinenko, Alexander (5 July 2006). “Кремлевский чикатило»”Chechenpresshttp://www.chechenpress.info/events/2006/07/05/03.shtml. Retrieved 2008-11-11.
  74. a b c “Poisoned spy accused Putin of being a paedophile”. London: Daily Mail. 20 November 206. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-417621/Poisoned-spy-accused-Putin-paedophile.html. Retrieved 2008-11-11.
  75. ^ “Putin recalls kissing boy’s belly”BBC News Online. 6 July 2006. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/5155448.stm. Retrieved 2008-11-11.
  76. ^ Batten, Gerard (3 April 2006). “Gerard Batten MEP – “60 second speech to the European Parliament “Romano Prodi” – Strasbourg”United Kingdom Independence Party. Archived from the original on October 13, 2006. http://web.archive.org/web/20061013081221/http://www.ukip.org/ukip_news/gen12.php?t=1&id=2055. Retrieved 2006-11-21.
  77. ^ “Dead spy’s widow accuses Russian authorities”CNN. 10 December 2006. Archived from the original on December 12, 2006. http://web.archive.org/web/20061212004137/http://edition.cnn.com/2006/WORLD/europe/12/10/russia.spy/index.html. Retrieved 2006-12-10.
  78. ^ “Litvinenko’s Father Says Son Requested Muslim Burial”PragueRadio Free Europe/Radio Liberty. 5 December 2006. http://www.rferl.org/content/article/1073226.html. Retrieved 6 April 2010.  (Archived at WebCite)
  79. ^ “Poison probe visits Russia”MoscowThe Washington Times. 4 December 2006. http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2006/dec/04/20061204-110524-6986r/. Retrieved 6 April 2010.  (Archived at WebCite)
  80. ^ Brown, Jonathan (8 December 2006). “Enemies of Putin gather for a burial in exile”. London: The Independenthttp://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/enemies-of-putin-gather-for-a-burial-in-exile-427548.html. Retrieved 6 April 2010.  (Archived at WebCite)
  81. ^ The Associated Press (22 May 2007). “Key figures in the Litvinenko affair”USA Todayhttp://www.usatoday.com/news/world/2007-05-22-litvinenko-key-figures_N.htm. Retrieved 2010-04-07.  (Archived at WebCite)
  82. ^ Gardham, Duncan; Steele, John (2 December 2006). “Spy’s contact and wife also poisoned”. London: The Daily Telegraphhttp://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1535776/Spys-contact-and-wife-also-poisoned.html. Retrieved 2010-04-07.  (Archived at WebCite)
  83. ^ “In memoriam Litvinenko”. The Welcome Stranger. December 2006. http://shop.thewelcomestranger.org/in-memoriam-litvinenko-89-p.asp. Retrieved 2010-06-11.
  84. ^ “Poisoned Russian former spy dies”CNN. 23 November 2006. Archived from the original on 2006-11-24. http://web.archive.org/web/20061124044529/http://www.cnn.com/2006/WORLD/europe/11/23/uk.spypoisoned/index.html. Retrieved 2006-11-23.
  85. ^ (Russian) An interview with Andrei Nekrasov by Yury VekslerRadio Liberty, 28 November 2006.
  86. ^ “Ex-spy’s death should not be used for provocation — Putin”HelsinkiRIA Novosti. 24 November 2006. http://en.rian.ru/russia/20061124/55967399.html. Retrieved 16 March 2010.  (Arhived at WebCite)
  87. ^ “Joint Press Conference with the Prime Minister of Finland Matti Vanhanen, President of the European Commission Jose Manuel Barroso, Secretary General of the EU Council and EU High Representative for the Common Foreign and Security Policy Javier Solana, Prime Minister of Norway Jens Stoltenberg and Prime Minister of Iceland Geir Haarde following the Russia-EU summit meeting”Helsinki City HallHelsinkiPresidential Press and Information Office. 24 November 2006. http://eng.kremlin.ru/speeches/2006/11/24/2355_type82914type82915_114506.shtml. Retrieved 16 March 2010. [dead link] (Archived at WebCite)
  88. ^ Jordan, Mary (10 June 2007). “Poisoned Russian Had Sought Entry to U.S., Book Says”Washington Posthttp://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/06/09/AR2007060901354_pf.html. Retrieved 2010-03-16.  (Archived at WebCite
  89. ^ “No signs of Poisoning”Sky News. 1 December 2006. http://news.sky.com/skynews/article/0,,30000-13554873,00.html. Retrieved 2006-12-02.
  90. ^ “‘Solemn’ burial for murdered spy”BBC News. 7 December 2006. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/6216202.stm. Retrieved 2006-12-08.
  91. ^ “Timeline: Litvinenko death case”BBC News. 27 July 2007. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/6179074.stm. Retrieved 2010-04-06.  (Archived at WebCite)
  92. ^ Litvinenko, Alexander (25 November 2006). “Why I believe Putin wanted me dead…”The Mail on Sundayhttp://www.mailonsunday.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=418652&in_page_id=1770. Retrieved 2010-04-06.  (Archived at WebCite)
  93. ^ “Litvinenko murdered over damaging file on Russian business partner”LondonDaily News and Analysis. 16 December 2006. http://www.dnaindia.com/world/report_litvinenko-murdered-over-damaging-file-on-russian-business-partner_1069687. Retrieved 2010-04-06.  (Archived at WebCite)
  94. ^ “Russian media shun poisoning case”BBC News. 20 November 2006. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/6165596.stm. Retrieved 2010-04-06.  (Archived at WebCite)
  95. ^ The Litvinenko files: Berezovsky
  96. ^ McGrory, Daniel; Halpin, Tony (20 January 2007). “Police match image of Litvinenko’s real assassin with his death-bed description”. London: Times Online. http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,3-2556377,00.html. Retrieved 2006-01-22.
  97. ^ “Murder in a Teapot”. “The Blotter” on ABCNews.com. 26 January 2007. http://blogs.abcnews.com/theblotter/2007/01/it_was_in_the_t.html. Retrieved 2006-01-26.
  98. ^ UK wants to try Russian for Litvinenko murder The Guardian. 26 January 2007
  99. ^ “Russian faces Litvinenko charge”. BBC News. 22 May 2007. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/6678887.stm. Retrieved 2007-05-22.
  100. ^ “Spy Murder Charge “Politically Motivated”". Sky News. 22 May 2007. http://news.sky.com/skynews/article/0,,30100-1266771,00.html. Retrieved 2006-05-22.
  101. ^ “British Prosecutors to Press Murder Charges in Litvinenko Case”Voice of America. 22 May 2007. http://voanews.com/english/2007-05-22-voa13.cfm. Retrieved 2007-05-22. [dead link]
  102. ^ “UK requests Lugovoi extradition”BBC. 28 May 2007. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/6698545.stm. Retrieved 2007-05-28.
  103. ^ The Sunday Times, “Russia murdered Litvinenko, says top prosecutor”
  104. ^ Weaver, John (24 November 2006). “Mafia Hit On The Media”. Atlantic Free Press. http://www.atlanticfreepress.com/content/view/262/. Retrieved 2006-11-26.
  105. ^ (Russian)Alexeev, Petr (24 November 2006). “Politkovskaya, Litvinenko, who is next?”. Electorat. Info. http://www.electorat.info/oligarx/22196-1/. Retrieved 2006-11-26.
  106. ^ (Russian)“Who orchestrated plan to discredit Russia?”Kommersant. 25 November 2006. http://www.kommersant.ru/doc-y.html?docId=724957&issueId=30261. Retrieved 2006-11-26.
  107. ^ Russian Billionaire’s Bitter Feud With Putin A Plot Line in Poisoning The Washington Post Retrieved on April 6, 2008
  108. ^ Hall, Ben (November 28, 2006). “Polonium 210 found at Berezovsky’s office”MSNBC. Archived from the original on October 26, 2007. http://web.archive.org/web/20071026025104/http://msnbc.msn.com/id/15923659/. Retrieved 2006-12-01.
  109. ^ Hall, Ben (November 27, 2006). “Radiation traces found in Berezovsky office”Financial Timeshttp://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/1b3fa168-7e59-11db-84bb-0000779e2340.html. Retrieved 2011-05-29.
  110. ^ Sandra Laville and Tania Branigan (November 28, 2006). “Polonium detected at Berezovsky’s office”The Guardianhttp://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2006/nov/28/russia.politics. Retrieved 2011-05-29.
  111. ^ Lugovoy case unsubstantial: Russian prosecution
  112. ^ Send Berezovsky back and we’ll help with Litvinenko case, says Russia Times Online Retrieved on April 6, 2008
  113. ^ “Wrap: Lugovoi says innocent, Berezovsky behind Litvinenko murder”MoscowRIA Novosti. 29 August 2007. http://en.rian.ru/russia/20070829/75649246.html. Retrieved 16 March 2010.  (Archived at WebCite)
  114. ^ Birch, Douglas (16 October 2008). “UK Envoy: Will press Russia in Litvinenko case”MoscowUSA Todayhttp://www.usatoday.com/news/world/2008-10-16-1408012780_x.htm. Retrieved 16 March 2010.  (Archived at WebCite)
  115. ^ Litvinenko coroner to examine if Russian state behind killing The Daily Telegraph13 Oct 2011
  116. ^ Strasbourg court sets deadline for Russia on Litvinenko case RIA Novosti15 Dec 2010
  117. ^ “Daybreak Pictures Commissioned To Produce Litvinenko Poisoning Drama”. All Headline News. 7 December 2006. http://www.allheadlinenews.com/articles/7005782642. Retrieved 8 December 2006.
  118. ^ Depp to make Litvinenko film
  119. ^ Depp Takes On the KGB, by Mike Bruno, Entertainment Weekly
  120. ^ Beeston, Richard (20 January 2007). “Film-maker fears returning to Russia”. London: Times Online. http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,13509-2556475.html. Retrieved 20 January 2007.

His books

 Books and Films about him

External links

The blurry film – apparently from a hidden camera – appeared to show one man being shot in Yuson town near the border with China on March 2, 2005. The condemned faced the firing squad shortly after a brief trial in which a judge found him guilty of trying to cross into China and smuggle others there.

Three gunmen each fired one shot at the prisoner who was tied to a pole.

Another female defendent was sentenced to10 years of labor camp.

The video was carried out of North Korea by several defectors. It was filmed by unnamed residents of the Stalinist state.

It decided to publicize the tape after determining witness accounts of the executions matched the images captured on film, the statement said.

A Seoul-based group called the Commission to Help North Korean Refugees said last month that North Korea had executed 70 defectors who were captured in China and sent home to discourage its citizens from fleeing the country.

The number of people fleeing North Korea decreased drastically following the executions, the group said.

A trickle of defectors from the communist North has swelled into a steady flow in recent years as more attempt to flee hunger and political repression in their homeland. Nearly 1,900 North Koreans defected to the South last year, an increase of almost 50 percent from the year before.

More than 100,000 North Koreans are living or hiding in China, the Commission to Help North Korean Refugees has estimated.

´

cats falck Neuer Presseartikel über Stasi Journalisten Mord an Heinz Gerlach und Cats Falck

Ermordete Journalistin Cats Falck

heinz gerlach 2201 Neuer Presseartikel über Stasi Journalisten Mord an Heinz Gerlach und Cats Falck

Ermordeter Journalist und Watchdog Heinz Gerlach

Erst werden die Opfer ausfindig gemacht und dann systematisch beobachtet, der Verwandten- und Bekanntenkreis wird abgeschöpft und unterwandert.

Das Opfer wird isoliert.

Dann folgt der Rufmord und die Vernichtung der Existenz – gesellschaftlich, finanziell und am Ende physisch – das hat “GoMoPa” selbst in deren Droh-Mails an mich mehrmals so angekündigt…

Es folgt in der dritten Phase der operative Schlag.

Aus Sicherheitsgründen kann ich Ihnen derzeit nur sagen, dass sie auch bei mir so vorgegangen sind.

Hier einige erschütternde Beispiele für den Mord an Journalisten durch die Stasi.

Am wichtigsten ist für sie immer, dass die Morde ungeklärt bleibt und sie entkommen können.

Dabei gehen sie heute wie damals nach den Stasi-Handbuch-Regeln der operativen Psachologie und der Mord-Studie Toxdat vor.

Durch das Internet sind die Opfer heute aber noch leichter auszuforschen. Nicht umsonst warnte BStU-Chef Roland Jahn vor den Gefahren von Facebook.

Auch bei mir wurde massiv versucht,  mein Facebook zu infiltrieren. Und die deutsche Justiz und Polizei mutmasslich unterwandert, machtlos und ahnungslos und in einigen Fällen, die uns bekannt und dokumentiert sind, sogar auf Seiten der Stasi-Täter.

Hier einige tragische Stasi-Morde der jüngsten Vergangenheit.

Maureen Cathryn Harriet „Cats“ Falck (* 11. Juli 1953 in Enskede, Schweden; † vermutlich 19. November 1984 im Hammarbyleden, Schweden) war eine schwedische Fernsehjournalistin.

Sie arbeitete für die Nachrichtensendung Rapport des Ersten Schwedischen Fernsehens (SVT1), bis sie im November 1984 verschwand und vermisst wurde.[1] Am 29. Mai 1985 wurden sie und ihre Freundin Lena Gräns in einem auf letztere zugelassenen Fahrzeug auf dem Boden des Kanals Hammarbyleden in Stockholm tot aufgefunden.

Die ermittelnden Behörden gingen von einem Unfall aus. Es gibt aber eine Reihe von Theorien, wonach sie ermordet wurde, weil sie einem Schmuggel von Waffen oder Technologie von Schweden in die DDR auf die Spur gekommen war.[2] Diese Theorien gehen zurück auf einen anonymen Brief, den die schwedische Verfassungsschutzbehörde Säpo im April 1997 erhielt,[3], dessen Inhalt im Juni 1997 von der Zeitung Dagens Nyheter journalistisch aufgearbeitet wurde [4] und der zu einer Wiederaufnahme des Falles durch die schwedischen Strafverfolgungsbehörden führte[3]. Die auffällige Passivität dieser Behörden und das Presseecho in Deutschland[5] führten dazu, dass auch die deutschen Strafverfolgungsbehörden dem Fall unter der Prämisse nachgingen, dass das Ministerium für Staatssicherheit der DDR („Stasi“) direkt oder indirekt für den Tod von Falck und Gräns verantwortlich sein könnte.[5] Die Ermittlungen der deutschen Behörden dauerten bis 2006 an und wurden aus Mangel an Beweisen eingestellt.

Lutz Eigendorf Neuer Presseartikel über Stasi Journalisten Mord an Heinz Gerlach und Cats Falck


Hatte die Stasi doch ihre Finger im Spiel, als Lutz Eigendorf starb?
Der mysteriöse Tod des Fußballers Lutz Eigendorf, der 1979 aus der DDR geflüchtet war, könnte erneut die Berliner Staatsanwaltschaft auf den Plan rufen. Ein früherer Inoffizieller Mitarbeiter (IM) der Stasi hatte vor dem Düsseldorfer Landgericht von einem Mordauftrag berichtet. Der Direktor der Berliner Stasiopfer-Gedenkstätte, Hubertus Knabe, beantragte die Wiederaufnahme der Ermittlungen.

Den Mord-Auftrag vom DDR-Ministerium für Staatssicherheit (MfS) habe der IM zwar angenommen, gibt aber an, ihn nicht ausgeführt zu haben, sagte Knabe. Der Historiker bat die Berliner Staatsanwaltschaft auch um eine Prüfung, ob die Leiche des Fußballers exhumiert werden könne. In MfS-Unterlagen habe es Hinweise auf eine Vergiftung gegeben. Eigendorf starb 1983 bei einem Auto-Unfall bei Braunschweig. Immer wieder war spekuliert worden, dass die Stasi dabei ihre Hände im Spiel hatte.

Bisher keine Beweise gefunden

“Wenn sich neue Gesichtspunkte ergeben, wird das Verfahren wieder aufgenommen”, sagte der Sprecher der Berliner Staatsanwaltschaft, Martin Steltner. “Mord verjährt nicht.” Die Anklagebehörde hatte den Fall über Jahre geprüft, zuletzt waren die Ermittlungen 2004 eingestellt worden. Handfeste Beweise wurden nicht gefunden.

Mysteriöser Autounfall

Lutz Eigendorf spielte in der DDR für den BFC Dynamo Berlin – den Lieblingsklub von Stasi-Chef Erich Mielke. Vier Jahre nach Eigendorfs Republikflucht krachte das Auto des 26-Jährigen gegen einen Baum bei Braunschweig. Der Spieler hatte 2,2 Promille Alkohol im Blut. Zeugen hatten allerdings beteuert, dass er nicht so viel getrunken hatte, als er ins Auto stieg.

Auftrag zum Mord?

Der mehrfach vorbestrafte Ex-Stasi-IM war wegen schweren Raubes zu sechseinhalb Jahren Haft verurteilt worden. Der 65-Jährige erzählte in dem Prozess auch, dass er Eigendorf liquidieren sollte. Die Stasi-Verpflichtungserklärung habe er nur unterschrieben, um seine Frau aus der DDR in die Bundesrepublik nachzuholen, sagte der frühere DDR-Boxmeister.

Stasi-Chef soll Liquidierung selbst angewiesen haben

Bis zu 50 hauptamtliche Stasi-Mitarbeiter sollen auf Eigendorf angesetzt gewesen sein, nachdem dieser sich in den Westen abgesetzt hatte, hatte der Buch- und Filmautor Heribert Schwan recherchiert. Er hatte in Stasi-Akten Hinweise auf ein als Unfall getarntes Mord-Komplott entdeckt. Eigendorf hatte nach einem Spiel einen Stadtbummel in Gießen zur Flucht genutzt. Er wurde dann beim 1. FC Kaiserslautern angestellt, wo er bis Juni 1982 spielte. Bis zu seinem Tod schnürte Eigendorf danach für Eintracht Braunschweig die Schuhe. Mielke selbst soll den Mord angeordnet haben.

Fehlende Stasi-Akten

Der Autor des Buches “Tod dem Verräter” fand auch Hinweise auf den heute 65 Jahre alten Ex-IM. Demnach soll dieser aus einem DDR-Gefängnis in die Bundesrepublik entlassen worden sein, um sich an Eigendorfs Fersen zu heften. Ermittlungen zu dem früheren Spitzel verliefen aber im Sande – seine Stasi-Akten für die Jahre 1980 bis 1983 fehlten.

Stasi-Mord aufgeklärt

all Robert Bialek nach 52 Jahren gelöst

Berlin – Nirgends in Europa war der Kalte Krieg heißer als im Berlin der fünfziger Jahre. Noch trennte keine Mauer den sowjetischen von den drei westlichen Sektoren. Doch gerade weil die Grenze offen war, war der Kontrast zwischen Freiheit und Diktatur besonders leicht zu erkennen – und damit umso gefährlicher für die SED.

So griff die Staatspartei neben Schmähpropaganda zum Beispiel gegen den “Frontstadt-Strategen” Willy Brandt auch zur Entführung von DDR-Kritikern und abtrünnigen Ex-Funktionären. Zwischen 1945 und 1961 sind Hunderte Fälle dokumentiert; die bekanntesten sind die Verschleppung von Walter Linse 1952 und von Karl Wilhelm Fricke 1955. Als “Menschenraub” machte die Praxis der Stasi, unliebsame Köpfe auf Jahre oder für immer verschwinden zu lassen, seinerzeit Schlagzeilen in der westlichen Presse.

Fast alle Fälle sind inzwischen aufgeklärt. Ein besonders prominenter Fall aber blieb bisher ungeklärt: der Verbleib von Robert Bialek, der im Februar 1956 entführt worden war. Jetzt hat ein Mitarbeiter der Stasi-Opfer-Gedenkstätte Hohenschönhausen durch Zufall einen Fund gemacht, der dieses Rätsel sehr wahrscheinlich aufklärt – mehr als zehn Jahre nach dem einzigen Prozess gegen einen der Täter.

Bialek war so etwas wie der “ideale Feind” der SED: Eigentlich überzeugter Sozialist, hatte der 1915 geborene Breslauer in der NS-Zeit im Gefängnis gesessen. 1946 war er Mitbegründer und erster Vorsitzender der sächsischen FDJ, bald darauf saß er als Generalinspekteur der “Volkspolizei” an einem Schalthebel der Diktatur. Doch Bialek unterwarf sich nicht Walter Ulbricht, und so wurde er degradiert und 1952 aus der SED ausgeschlossen. Wenig später ging Bialek mit seiner Familie nach West-Berlin. Damit war er für die SED ein “Parteifeind”.

“Schlimmer” noch: Bialek gab der BBC mehrere Interviews, die bis weit nach Ostdeutschland ausgestrahlt wurden. Er berichtete, mit welchen Methoden Ulbricht seine Macht konsolidierte. Als dann ein Jahr später bekannt wurde, dass Bialek unter dem Decknamen “Bruno Wallmann” in West-Berlin für das Ostbüro der SPD arbeitete, war das Maß für die Stasi voll: Seine Entführung wurde vorbereitet.

Am 4. Februar 1956 war es soweit: Zwei Spitzel trafen den 40 Jahre alten Bialek in einer Wohnung an der Jenaer Straße (Wilmersdorf) und träufelten ihm K.-o.-Tropfen ins Bier. Bialek merkte, was geschah, und ging auf die Toilette; dort brach er zusammen. Der ahnungslose Hauptmieter der Wohnung fand, als er gegen 21.30 Uhr das Bad benutzen wollte, den vermeintlich betrunkenen Gast seines Untermieters Paul Drzewiecki. Mit seinem Kumpan Herbert Hellwig schleppte Drzewiecki das Opfer zu einem rasch herbei gerufenen Auto. Dann, am 4. Februar 1956 um 21.40 Uhr, verlor sich bisher die Spur von Robert Bialek.

Bei einer Routine-Recherche ist nun der Historiker Peter Erler von der Gedenkstätte Hohenschönhausen auf einen ziemlich eindeutigen Hinweis gestoßen. Er sah bei der Birthler-Behörde die Kladden durch, in denen alle Häftlingszugänge in der zentralen Untersuchungshaftanstalt der Stasi verzeichnet wurden. Dabei stieß Erler zwar nicht auf den Namen Bialek, aber auf einen Eintrag ohne Namen und ohne Geburtsdatum, dafür aber mit einem genauen Einlieferungstermin: 4. Februar 1956, 23 Uhr. Eingeliefert worden war dieser Gefangene, der mit der Nummer 2357 registriert wurde, von der Stasi-Hauptabteilung V, die nachweislich die Entführung geplant hatte.

Noch wichtiger: In der Spalte “Abgang” gibt es ebenfalls keinen Eintrag. Das ist für die komplett erhaltenen Kladden absolut ungewöhnlich. Für Hubertus Knabe, den Direktor der Gedenkstätte, spricht alles dafür, dass es sich bei dem Gefangenen um Bialek handelte. “80 Minuten nach seiner Entführung kommt hier spätabends ein Gefangener an. Zieht man die Fahrtzeit und die Einlasskontrollen ab, ist das exakt der Zeitpunkt, an dem Bialek eingeliefert worden sein muss.”

Da die Kladden streng geheim waren, stehen alle anderen Namen darin. Die nahe liegende Vermutung: Bialek kam bereits als Toter in Hohenschönhausen an oder starb gleich nach seiner Einlieferung. Dass er bald nach seiner Entführung gestorben war, hatte die West-Berliner Justiz stets vermutet. Der Zufallsfund von Peter Erler stützt diese Annahme.

http://www.welt.de/welt_print/article1879693/Stasi_Mord_aufgeklaert.html

Das Ministerium für Staatssicherheit der DDR (kurz MfS oder Stasi) war der Inlands- und Auslandsgeheimdienst der DDR und zugleich Ermittlungsbehörde (Untersuchungsorgan) für „politische Straftaten“. Das MfS war innenpolitisch vor allem ein Unterdrückungs- und Überwachungsinstrument der SED (“Schild und Schwert der Partei”) gegenüber der DDR-Bevölkerung, das dem Machterhalt diente. Dabei setzte es als Mittel Überwachung, Einschüchterung, Terror[1][2] und die so genannte Zersetzung gegen Oppositionelle und Regimekritiker („feindlich-negative Personen“) ein.

Das MfS wurde am 8. Februar 1950 gegründet. Der Sprachgebrauch der SED, der das MfS als „Schild und Schwert der Partei“ bezeichnete, beschreibt die ihm zugedachte Funktion im politisch-ideologischen System der DDR.

Neben dem MfS gab es auch einen weiteren Nachrichtendienst in der DDR, die Verwaltung Aufklärung der NVA (militärischer Aufklärungsdienst) mit Sitz in Berlin-Treptow. Die Verwaltung Aufklärung wurde ebenso wie die Grenztruppen und die restliche NVA durch die Hauptabteilung I (MfS-Militärabwehr) kontrolliert („abgesichert“).

Dear Readers,

here is on your request the Original Meridian Capital Document:

http://othergomopa.blogspot.com/

Saturday, July 11, 2009

KLAUS DIETER MAURISCHAT IN DETENTION

Source: http://klaus-dieter-maurischat.blogspot.com/2009/01/klaus-dieter-maurischat-in-haft.html
KLAUS DIETER MAURISCHAT IN HAFT — DownloadGerman VersionHere is a Google Translation (German -> English)Sunday 18 Januar 2009 January 2009

KLAUS DIETER MAURISCHAT IN DETENTIONMeridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. unveils new criminal phenomena in network I. SachverhaltIn recently appeared on the net more often at the same time a new a very worrying phenomenon of criminal nature. Professional criminals groups in the network are taking part, to extortion, fraud, Erschwindeln relating to certain specifically selected companies and businesses are capable of. These criminals developed new methods and means, simply and in a short time to bereichern.Strategien and manifestations, which underlie this process are fairly simple. A criminal is looking to “carefully” on the Internet specific companies and corporations (victims of crime) and informed them in the next step, that of the business activities of such companies and corporations in the near future – first on the Internet then in other available mass media – numerous and very unfavorable information appears. At the same time, the criminals beat their future victims an effective means of reducing unnecessary difficulties and problems to escape the loss of good name and image of the company and corporate sector. These offenders are aware of that reputation, name and appearance of each company is a value in itself. It was therefore a value of what each company is prepared to pay any price. But the reason for difficulties and problems arising from the loss of good name and reputation result. The criminals and their victims are already aware that this loss is devastating consequences might have been the closing down of a particular business can enforce. It takes both to No as well as at large companies regard. The company is concerned that in virtually every industry in each country and cross-border activities sind.Das criminal procedure in the form of a blackmail on money, a fraud is becoming rapidly and globally, ie led cross-border and internationally. Among the victims of extortion, fraud is now looking both at home (domestic) and international corporations, the major emphasis on conservation, keeping and maintaining their reputation in the business according to their credibility lay. The criminals in the network have understood that maintaining an unassailable reputation and name of a company the unique ability to provide fast and easy enrichment forms. The above-mentioned criminal procedure is difficult to track because it is international in nature, and by overlapping or even nonexistent (fictional) professional and judicial persons in various countries and operated company wird.Diese offenders in the network publish it and disseminate false information about your victims on remote servers, which are not uncommon in many exotic countries. There are those countries in which serious gaps in the legal system, investigative and prosecution procedures are visible. As an example, at this point mention India werden. Mit criminals working in the network grid portals known leader of blogs with your seat-consciously or unconsciously, even in highly developed countries. For example, at this point, countries such as Germany, Austria, Switzerland, the United States, Britain, Spain or Portugal are mentioned. The below listed criminals were able to act unpunished today. As a symptom of such action appears here the activity and “effectiveness” of the company GOMOPA, which is on countries such as Germany, Switzerland, Austria, the United States, Britain, Spain and India. A good example of such an action is Mr. Klaus Mauri Chat – the leader and “brain” of the company GOMOPA with many already in force and criminal judgments “on his account”, which in this way for years and funded its maintenance in the industry almost unlimited activity. This status will change dramatically, however, including far and wide thanks to discontinued operations of the firm Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. who would oppose such offenses addressed in the network. Other companies and corporations, in which the crime network and outside of this medium have fallen victim to contribute to combating such crimes bei.Die situation is changing, thanks to effective steps and the successful cooperation of the firm Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. with the international police Interpol, with the federal agency (FBI) in the U.S., the Federal Criminal Police in Germany, with Scotland Yard in Britain, as well as with the Russian secret service FSB.Die Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. – Together with other companies and cooperations, the victim of criminal activities of the network of crime have fallen – has undeniably already started to yield results. The fact that in recent weeks (November 2008) on the territory of the Federal Republic of Germany of the above-mentioned leaders and “brain” of the company GOMOPA, Mr Klaus Maurishat was arrested should not be ignored. The Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. information available results clearly show that the next arrests of persons participating in this process in such countries as: Austria, Switzerland, Russia, Ukraine, Poland, Spain, Mexico, Portugal, Brazil, the USA, Canada, UK, Ireland , Australia, New Zealand and made in a.. The ultimate goal of Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. and the other victims of crime in the network is to provide all participants in this criminal procedure before the competent court to lead. All professional and judicial persons, regardless of the seat and out of the business, which the above-described criminal action (fraud, extortion) to have fallen victim can of Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. led company to join the goal set at all at this point the procedure described those associated in the public and the economic life out. II blacklist blackmail and with international fraudsters and their methods (opus operandi) in the following countries: 1 The Federal Republic Deutschland2. Dubai 3rd Russia 1st The Federal Republic of Germany GmbH GOMOPA, Goldman Morgenstern & Partners LLC., Goldman Morgenstern & Partners Consulting LLC, Wottle collection. In these firms are quite active following persons: – Klaus Mauri Chat ( “Father” and “brain” of the criminal organization responsible for countless final judgments have been achieved (arrested in Germany in November 2008) – Josef Rudolf Heckel ( “right hand “when Mr Klaus Mauri chat, denounced former banker who is excessive in many Bankschmuggeleien was involved.(Today, persona non grata in the German banking industry); – Peter Reski (responsible for Finance, known for fraud, tax fraud and embezzlement, which is already behind the judgments are final) – Mark Vornkahl (responsible for organizational and administrative tasks in GOMOPA, a former police officer dismissed because of numerous expectations in the service, already has a few final judgments “on his account”); – Claus i Ulrike Wottle (married couple, for the so-called “unconventional” enforcement of the debt for the benefit GOMOPA. This execution was imposing, with extortion violence based on both real and fictitious debts references? How does the system of GOMOPADie above-mentioned persons in Brief, as well as with the service GOMOPA cooperating, so-called “experts GOMOPA” Bloggers and all other professional and legal persons choose from all possible sources of information about large, rich companies and corporations coming in various domestic and international sectors of the economy. GOMOPA The service is particularly keen that those aussucht, the “in itself visible.” Those companies corporations and, therefore, against the relatively easy and without much effort himself, inconsistencies, etc. can be done in terms of the even crimes such as cheating and Erschwindeln Others can easily perform. It is well known that every company especially good at their presence and her name is inviolable. Each company will do everything according to their good presence also retain its credibility to be. But if the victim of GOMOPA and his “partner” and a large range of businesses, so it is possible to call such companies a quick, easy, and even considerably enriched. It appears at this point the question: Which clever criminals in the network and outside the network to me is success, it does not wish to benefit? The criminals in the network know that without business credibility there is no confidence that any business is essential. GOMOPA and all are cooperating with the security of all possible methods and measures mastered how to credibility and confidence of a company, a company, corporation (crime victims) in question. This moves just the attention of the user, so that the homepage of the GOMOPA www.gomopa.net in search engines like Google, Yahoo is easy to find. This, in turn, means nothing other than additional profits for the service GOMOPA because of its activity around a media discourse created wird.Ein at first glance commonplace and easy victims of extortion, for example, can a public governmental body, which, based on the credibility of public works, such as a bank or a foreign bank financial institution. So it was with the foreign banks, international financial institution Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. the case. A simple and easy victims of illicit profits and material may include insurance companies, where – as it is from our search results, much to the criminal activities of the GOMOPA especially in the area of the Federal Republic of Germany, Switzerland and Austria was due. Among the known and identifiable victims is certainly German, Austrian and Swiss banks, insurance companies such as Allianz of Germany, German and Austrian companies such as HDI and DKV visible. This is what the service GOMOPA trust and what with the cooperating services, blogs nowadays practice is the so-called cyber-stalking, which rapidly spread in the network. The method is criminal at this point and others in the threat that the business of an enterprise (Ofer blackmail, threats and forcible ) fictitious, even non-existent information (lies, rumors, stories, statements, insults) on the net first then in other mass media. This is only used to a potential victim to move a considerable sum of money for the so-called “peace “the blackmailer available. The” quiet “here means the promise of access lock with respect to the fictitious publication of any information on the net and in all other mass media, the victims of extortion in extremely negative light showing. Such threats are, as already above the goal of companies – potential victims of cyber-stalking to do likewise, that they themselves “buy.” In short, GOMOPA and his peers, and cooperating with those services, and blogs, create a “virtual reality”, or otherwise said publishing fictitious information on potential victims of a crime. firms and corporations, against which threats and extortion by GOMOPA are not due, ie those who for so-called “peace” does not want to pay, to be victims of serious lies, insults, and Insinuationen other criminal misappropriations, the appearance and presence of a firm with certainty. One is a target of GOMOPA, namely as fast and as easy as it goes, money abzukassieren, and if a company refuses, and the “peace” do not buy wishes, it is unexpectedly and quickly become an object of extortion and defamation on the net. At this point the following question arises: How is it possible that the leader of the firm GOMOPA, Mr Klaus Mauri chat, only in the Federal Republic of Germany on his account “23 court rulings, has for many years as an honest citizen to create, while other persons, firms, corporations criminal acts, offenses memorize, in addition to substantial sums of money could earn? This complex process can only be explained as follows: GOMOPA creates his appearance, his presence in the eyes of public opinion as an honest subject, against which pathological phenomena in the public and economic life einschreitet. GOMOPA and his partner (services, blogs) present themselves as followers of any Verbrechensart that promise so the fight against criminals in each virtual network ( especially against any cheaters, blackmailers). GOMOPA used in this respect a kind of “Merketingsvorhang” as a method of seduction, a result which is his true “face” and his true intentions than that of a fraudster and blackmail on money can hide. The true intentions of the GOMOPA, of working together GOMOPA Services and blogs were until today no doubt with success before the public opinion will remain hidden, especially thanks to the so-called “smoke curtain”, which reflects the fact that man himself as a “winner” of any abuse and any pathological appearance of the public and economic life in Aland German, Austria, Switzerland, the United States, Britain, Russia, Spain created. Next appears the GOMOPA forward by the person on which companies and corporations – the future victims of the crime that is – against the possibility of the release of extremely poor and the company concerned in a negative light visual information on the Internet and other mass media warns. The person from whom the speech is also informed that they are successful against such a procedure for a “fee” can be used. The GOMOPA is at this point up to the extortion of money for so-called “peace” to the company and corporation (the victim of a crime) around. Most of the companies concerned to such threats did not respond, because it’s everyday life and their agenda. It finally barely missing on the web of blackmail and outside of the medium. Normally so seldom so-called “understanding”, while on the one hand, the crime victim, on the other hand, the GOMOPA occurs. It is understandable that the price for such an “understanding” means the provision of the requested funds would GOMOPA. The financial blackmail in this stage is rarely enforced. The situation changes little, however, if the firms and corporations (crime victims) find that the threat was fulfilled. In Brief will appear on the homepage www.gomopa.net numerous newspaper articles, reports and bogus pseudo market analysis, both by GOMOPA as well as so-called “independent experts” and the company will be represented, with formal or fictitious GOMOPA together. Information published here, correspond to the contents of a threat and make the operations of firms and corporations in an extremely negative light dar. There is no doubt that such actions and methods only to harm the good name and good presence of these firms and corporations prerogatives. The activity of GOMOPA is certainly not exhausted. GOMOPA disseminated (published accommodates) the above information in the network by the credible, and popular opinion-operated services. Moreover, GOMOPA threatens the companies and corporations (its victims), that “from the finger-drawn” information not only on the network, but also on television and on radio and in the press landscape erscheinen.Wie the experience and expertise of the former Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. show that the services are usually not aware that they are for the purpose of a criminal action by the GOMOPA used. They agree with the corresponding fictitious publications, reports and analysis on what specifically GOMOPA through and through “independent” experts are prepared. It also states that the services, and blogs such cooperation with the GOMOPA approval, although they know that the information transmitted by GOMOPA are fictitious and the credibility of companies and corporations affect. They take so aware of the criminal procedure part. The explanation of this situation is quite simple. GOMOPA pays namely the services, and blogs related remuneration that the publication of false information on the companies and corporations (crime victims) agree. Some services, and blogs seem to know nothing about it to have that on their pages available information “fictitious” and “pulled out of the fingers are. Are you looking for in this way their conduct to justify, because they want the legal consequences of participating in the abuse of the good name and appearance of a company or corporation to escape. The activity system of GOMOPA of collaborating services and blogs was also the example of Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. tested. Beginning in October 2008 was one of the workers of Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. a message from an anonymous sender, in the near future – first on the Internet, then on television, radio and in the German press – information published by the functioning and activities of Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. in an extremely negative light show. The employee of Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. was then informed that these reports / news undoubtedly significantly the appearance and the reputation of the firm Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. affect. The place mentioned in this “conversation partner” has the workers of Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. informed that the possibility of the embarrassing situation to be avoided by Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. to the person shown by the account the sum of 100,000.00 EUR transfers. As later revealed, however, was Mr. Klaus Mauri Chat – this anonymous interlocutor – “brain” and “Leader of the GOMOPA”. The investigations have been employed by the Federal Judicial Police (tracking and identifying the body at the federal level) during the investigation for the payment of blackmail, fraud and threats because of what Mr Mauri chatting and his staff were practiced, and for participation by other (head of Internet services and moderators of blogs) on this process. These crimes have been committed to loss of many professional and judicial persons, including the Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. The victims of this crime in Germany, Austria, Switzerland, Spain, Portugal, Great Britain, the USA and Canada visible. At this moment appeared the following question: What was the reaction of Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. to the demands from GOMOPA? Corresponded to the response to the expectations of GOMOPA? Has the Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. the required sum of EUR 100,000.00 paid? Side of Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. There was absolutely no reaction to the extortion attempt by GOMOPA. At the end of August 2008 on the Service www.gompa.net numerous articles / reports published by the activities of Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. in a very negative light have represented. Once the information contained on www.gomopa.net detail and were fully analyzed, it is that they are not even the truth at one point and potential and existing customers of Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. in relation to the financial institution from this discontinued business activities is misleading. Following the criminal Handlugen of GOMOPA and its cooperating services, and blogs on the network, the Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. measurable and significant business losses. The Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. has primarily an important group of potential customers lost. But what it showed as important, the existing customers of Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. little away. Those customers have used our services and continue to use the still. In view of the existing collaboration with the Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.., Which will in turn be no objections. GOMOPA has such a course of events accurately predicted, which aims significant and measurable business by Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. losses were suffered. The course of events, the service GOMOPA certainly pleased. GOMOPA has to expect that the position of Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. declines and the financial institution, the required sum (100.000,00 EUR) provides. Over time, as the whole procedure in the network was becoming more popular, tried GOMOPA still four times to the Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. Contacts, each time by adjusting these criminal “Kompanie” has promised, although it every time his financial demands heraufsetzte. The last of the set of “company” against Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. ratio was even planned EUR 5,000,000.00 (in words: EURO fünfmilionen). The Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. could but before the ever-increasing demands from the Service GOMOPA claim. In October 2008 met the management of Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. Decision on the notification of the INTERPOL International Police and the appropriate law enforcement institutions of the FRG (the police and the prosecutor) about the existing situation. In the meantime, reported at the Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. numerous companies and corporations, and even professional person such as doctors, judges, priests, actors and other people from different countries of the world, the extortion of GOMOPA relented and the required amounts of money it had. These people already gave statements that they have done so, so they finally just “be in peace” and unnecessary problems, difficulties, and a reasonable conclusion hardly avoid them. The victims of this criminal action, the Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. using different amounts of money which were requested, informed. In one case, there were relatively small (a few thousand EURO), in another case it has to deliver significant amounts (around few million EURO). Additionally turned to Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. Companies which have not yet GOMOPA the “fee” on out and have already considered whether they should do or not. These firms anticipated by Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. a clear opinion as well as a practical professional advice on how to be in such a situation should behave and how they can avoid debt. The Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. has invariably victims of all crimes, which are at our company have made a cooperation proposed. The top task is to this cooperation, jointly determined and effective measures against GOMOPA against other services in the network, and against all Bloggers to meet in the here described with international criminal procedure GOMOPA leaders to participate. All these companies were known as the Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. proposed “crusade” against GOMOPA, his partner. At our request to notify all participating companies the INTERPOL International Police and their pursuit of domestic institutions, including the competent public prosecutor and the police authorities about the existing situation. In view of the fact that the criminal act of GOMOPA be extended over many states and that the number of the Federal Republic of Germany because the ads reimbursed by GOMOPA, Internet Services and Bloggers crimes, grew up fast – which no doubt influenced by a far-reaching impact of criminal of GOMOPA testifies – International Business, the Police INTERPOL Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. before that its representatives in Berlin with representatives from GOMOPA true to the “payment arrangements and transfer the sum of EUR 5,000,000.00 to discuss. This step meant a well thought-out and by the Federal Criminal Police organized the event to carry out aimed at the arrest of international criminals GOMOPA acting was. The coordinated steps and measures of Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. Damaged and others, led by the International Economic Police INTERPOL, the Federal Criminal Police Office and the Prosecutor of the Federal Republic of Germany for education, training and implementation of the above-described case contributed. In November 2008, the event in Berlin prepared for the apprehension and arrest of the representative of the GOMOPA, after the arrest of Mr. Klaus Mauri chat – as the main leaders and leaders of international criminal group GOMOPA recalled. The arrest and notified the Federal Criminal Police showed both the current whereabouts of Mr. Klaus Mauri chat. “Brain” and the founder of this international criminal group GOMOPA, Mr Klaus Mauri chat on the same day was also arrested and imprisoned on time, will soon put in charge state, the responsibility for their own crimes and those of the forum, before a competent GOMOPA Federal wear. The Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. undertook all possible steps to ensure that Mr. Klaus Mauri chatting on the dock of the competent court of the United Kingdom of Great Britain appears. Among the damaged work and justice people from United Kingdom, along with the Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. There are many victims of GOMOPA: The beginning of the arrests with such a scale means for the German judiciary and a major breakthrough point. It is worth noting that the prosecution bodies of the Federal Republic, up to this stage of the long-standing criminal activity of Mr. Klaus Mauri chatting and his staff were powerless. Prolonged impunity of the criminal actions of Mr. Klaus Mauri chat, for years the “first violin” in GOMOPA played, is to end gegangen.An this point another question arises: how is it so go on? The arrest of Mr. Klaus chat Mauri is a critical moment, in other words a “turn around 180 degrees” for him personally. But it also means the beginning of the end “for its employees, for Internet Services, Bloggers, with GOMOPA so happy and had worked together without contradiction. There is no doubt that the cause of Mr Klaus Mauri chat at the top of the “iceberg” is. The above-mentioned turning point on this issue will be further arrests and detentions of members GOMOPA bring with them, and all persons from all areas involved in this transnational criminal actions have taken part. For information (reports by the end of December 2008), which of Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. available, the result that the next arrests currently prepared to be associated with the Services GOMOPA cooperating persons. This is to people outside Germany – from where Mr Klaus Mauri chat coming – refer. The details may be at this point in terms of legal and course of the prosecution bodies of the BRG and the Interpol-led investigation can not be betrayed. The Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. currently can only illustrate information from the investigation led the public to the criminal liability not to have this moment wird.In so intense preparations for the arrest of a number of persons outside the Federal Republic of Germany. This applies particularly to countries such as the following: – Russia-Ukraine – Poland – Spain – Mexico – Portugal – Brazil – the United States of America – Canada – UK – Ireland – Australia – New Zealand – India. All professional and judicial persons, regardless of the country in which they accompany the Office, or its citizens, and until now, consciously or unconsciously with the Forum GOMOPA together, or continue to work together to arouse the suspicion of the INTERPOL International Police. This works with the police criminal investigation department in each country, to the above persons first identify and then to legally pursue them. Information about this topic, as well as on the beginning and end of the activity of the GOMOPA can be at the following addresses on the Web at: http://gomopaabzocker.wordpress.com/ – http://www.nepper-schlepper-bauernfaenger.com – http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qNpzAu-QMuE – www.korte.de/alexander/2006/01/gomopa-finanforum-kritik.html- http://evelux.de/gomopa-sam-240/- http://blog.deobald.org/archive/2007/07/01/betrugsvorwurf-gomopa-spam/ 2. Dubai KLP Group Emirates – United Arab Emirates. As head of the company is Mr Martin Kraeter, not only as the “brain” of the whole company, but also as a longstanding friend of Mr Klaus Mauri Chat (GOMOPA-wire) acts. This company wants to hide and not even officially exist, that they as a strategic partner of the GOMOPA in the area of the Middle East, according to the territory of the Persian coast operates. Official activities of the company KLP Group Emirates includes among others the following areas: financial advisory services from the offshore area (Management Services – Facilitators – OffshoreConsultants, International Tax & Legal Consultants – Fiduciaries). In the sphere of activities of the Company will include the creation of companies and enterprises in the so-called “tax havens” to the tax liability to the company activity entfliehen.Inoffizielle KLP Group Emirates includes cooperation with the Service GOMOPA in the field of “Gelwäsche”. The monies are a result of criminal activity by GOMOPA generated by advanced professional and judicial persons soon throughout the world and legalized. The illegality based on the activity of the company KLP Group Emirates, as well as the cooperation with the Services GOMOPA attracted attention even when the prosecution organs of the United Kingdom of Great Britain, especially in Scotland Yard, which on this issue an intensive investigation has begun, which is in the ” development phase is located. It must be noted that all professional and judicial persons, but especially the clients of the company KLP Group Emirates, with the company KLP Group Emirates have cooperated in the past and still do, under the “Lupp” of Scotland Yard to be .3. Russlanda) The Company E-XECUTIVE by the Lord led Novosartow Vilen. On the homepage of the Company contained information comes directly from the company GOMOPA. The company e XECUTIVE leads the close cooperation not only with GOMOPA, but also with another on the Russian territory under the name of OOO UK broker functioning company. The company e XECUTIVE in connection with the company OOO UK broker is a member of a criminal group led by GOMOPA. The company e XECUTIVE GOMOPA representing interests in Russia and Central-Eastern Europe. Unofficially, the company employs E XECUTIVE-especially with the search for potential “victims” of the Erschwindelns, blackmail and forcing the funds for GOMOPA companies and corporations from the territory of Russia, Ukraine, and from all countries in Central Eastern Europe. Officially, the company e XECUTIVE one to the forum GOMOPA similar industrial activity. b) OOO “UK broker.” Head of the firm is Mr. Pavel Kokarev. This company is not concealed, that they are consistent with the Forum GOMOPA cooperates. The company OOO UK broker represents GOMOPA in Central Eastern Europe, including Russia. You shall be officially transferred to this area the GOMOPA similar activity, but unofficially it is to search for potential “victims” of racketeering, fraud and Erschwindelns for GOMOPA employed. The company has remained until now spared from any punishment, it could with “eternal impunity” because of a poorly developed, corrupt legal system in Russia expected. The situation may change after Mr. Klaus Mauri Chat arrested in Berlin and was arrested. This constant offenders, the “on his account” a set of legally enforceable judgments has, until now his freedom has unlimited recover, the do not know quite what it means to be arrested, begins gradually, according to our available information to finally “to bear witness.” This is understandable when one considers the threat of a penalty he considered. This delinquent shows growing interest in cooperation with the German tracking and identifying bodies. So there is a chance that other people he unveiled to the public by providing for reduction of prison sentence counts. It is also the only question of time INTERPOL, in cooperation with the Russian Service (FSB) of the Company OOO UK broker “at the door knocking”, which by Mr. Pavle Kokarev and represented. The company OOO UK broker has a virtual office in REGUS building in Moscow, is not even a person, forming a typical one-person company, which all business “crimes” may be the name of it, with no civil liability to pay. The Lord Pavel Kokarev seems to have forgotten or do not have sufficient knowledge about its possible responsibility fier to participate in the international crimes under the direction of Gomopa.
Barak: “Iran and Hezbullah are determined to avenge, we will continue to operate against the terror front”

Israel’s Minister of Defense Ehud Barak and the senior officials of the Israeli defense establishment inaugurated the Israeli pavilion at the Singapore Air Show on Tuesday morning. The Israeli delegation arrived accompanied by heavy security, due to the event that occurred yesterday near the embassy in New Delhi, India, and the attempt to harm the Israeli embassy in Georgia.

Barak referenced the events at the inauguration of the Israeli pavilion, saying, “Israel is dealing with defense challenges. The attack in India and the event in Georgia did not come from Denmark or Belgium. Responsibility for the events comes from the same elements.” Barak held Iran and Hezbollah responsible, saying, “They are continuing to focus on avenging and causing casualties. We will have to continue operating against the terror front.” Barak also spoke of the defense export’s contribution to the security of Israel.

Miki Federman, the owner of Elbit Systems, said during the inauguration ceremony that cooperation between the industries and the defense establishment is widening. “The ministry is helping us by promoting the defense export in any way possible,” Federman noted.

The Singapore Air Show is considered one of the most important defense exhibitions of the year, and features guests and buyers from across the world, but primarily from Southeast Asian countries. SIBAT, the defense assistant division of the Israeli government, set up an Israeli national pavilion – which includes large companies such as IAI, IMI, Rafael, and Elbit Systems, alongside smaller companies such as Eromaoz and Kanfit.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 343 other followers